Why I Am A Male Chauvinist

Recently a commenter suggested that I post about how I became a female misogynist. I’ve been thinking about what to post.

I could summarize my life story, which has been an object lesson – though far from the worst one I know of – in the disastrous effects of allowing women power in society, but then, whose hasn’t? Most people of my generation and younger had mothers who were happy to be told that being a mother was something you could do in your spare time, between more important, “fulfilling” pursuits.

No one has been able to remain unaware that our schools, which are run almost entirely by women, have become hotbeds of violence and sexual assault in which little if any “learning” takes place, so I don’t need to recount my personal saga of spending my childhood being beaten up and groped by boys while the teachers watched happily, giggling girlishly when one of the boys glanced her way. Just last night I came across this: Girls Accepting Sexual Assault At School As Fact Of Life. Consider this carefully: this is a realm where the authority figures are almost all female, and girls are completely unsafe from boys in it. This is precisely the opposite of what feminists keep claiming will happen if they’re in charge. (Also take into account that many of these boys who terrorized me were denied a male authority figure at home by divorce. The overwhelming majority of violent criminals, welfare recipients, and substance abusers come from fatherless homes.)

Then there’s the many female friends who turned on me for the most incredibly superficial reasons. No amount of generosity on my part could forestall this: gifts, shelter, financial support, a sympathetic ear, favors, hopping on a plane at a moment’s notice (in October of 2001, no less) because I was needed, everything I could give did me no good when I had served my purpose and the female in question was bored with me. This is why divorce is so hard to get in civilized countries; women, by nature, will drop people when they’re no longer amusing or useful. When they’re in a chimpanzee troop or a primitive tribe, this is only sensible for keeping the species going, but for a civilization, it pretty much sucks. Women with a sense of loyalty exist, but they are very rare. But everyone who has entrusted a woman with affection has experienced this.

And of course, there’s the women I’ve dated. Being a female misogynist is an uncomfortable position for a lesbian, but it’s also damn near inescapable. When I first came out of the closet, I rented a movie called Bar Girls, about a bunch of constantly shifting, insanely neurotic lesbian romantic relationships. I thought it was impossibly over the top. Of course, at that point I’d only had one date. One year later, I had been in several relationships every bit as insane. I spent two years in the lesbian dating game, experiencing firsthand what the Sexual Revolution has done to people’s ability to commit. The straight women who write Cosmo are always complaining that they can’t get men to commit to marriage. The women I’ve dated couldn’t handle commitments along the lines of “I’ll meet you at eight”. I dated one woman for two weeks. Not only was she unable to stay faithful for an entire fortnight, I also caught her in four separate lies – which means there must be more I didn’t stick around long enough to find out about. Then there was the one who was sleeping with several other people and using drugs, both of which she lied about right up until the end. And the one who whined and whined about how her ex-girlfriend had battered her and cheated on her, and then dumped me when that same ex asked her to come back. The only lesbians I know who don’t have a supply of similar horror stories are the ones who haven’t dated yet. And I know that straight men get put through the exact same wringers.

I had dreamed of meeting Miss Right and settling down with her and raising a family, a proper loving family to compensate for the one I didn’t have growing up. (This, by the way, is one of the most damaging effects of feminism’s erosion of commitment. In past eras, people who were unfortunate enough to be born into unloving families could marry as soon as they became adults and create families of their own, where they could create the warmth and security they had always lacked. Nowadays, everyone has been trained to think of divorce, serial polygamy, late marriage and promiscuity as normal, so we don’t have that option. If your parents didn’t have the whim to give you affection, you’re probably out of luck for life.) After a couple of years of finding out what dating women was like, I stopped dating and haven’t for years.

So really, my story is pretty normal. I had an irresponsible feminist mother, vicious incompetent feminist teachers, backstabbing fickle feminist female friends, and lying unfaithful girlfriends. Currently, I have many female friends, but I keep all but one of them at arms’ length, because I am no longer able to trust females. The one exception, well, she’s definitely an outlier, like Condi Rice, Margaret Thatcher, Elizabeth I, etc. Even so, if she and I had met a couple of years later, when my bitterness towards my own sex had hardened more, we probably wouldn’t have become close friends.

The real question is, why aren’t more people misogynists and/or male chauvinists? We all go through the same stuff. The reason, I believe, is that we’ve been conditioned to think that modern loneliness and untrustworthiness are normal, even though in living memory things were very different. Also, there is the massive propaganda blaming all the horrible problems which have come into existence during the decades of feminism, all of which were virtually nonexistent before feminism, on “the patriarchy” – you know, that thing we put an end to four decades ago.

It was dating women that really opened my eyes. Back when I dated men (or teenage boys, when I was a teen), I had some bad experiences. But the worst of them pale in significance compased to what even the best of my girlfriends did. My girlfriends routinely lied to me, lied about me, cheated on me, stood me up, and broke promises. None of my boyfriends did any of that. Really, most of my boyfriend troubles were caused by me having high expectations (out of loneliness) that they had done nothing to invite. After a few trips around the block I stopped expecting my boyfriends to give more than they promised, and only one led me to expect more than he gave. All of my girlfriends did that.

That’s how I became a misogynist, but misogyny is just an emotion. It’s a dislike or hatred of women. I’ve always been a compulsive reader, and I started noticing more and more stray facts that conflicted with feminist gospel. Being of an intellectual bent, I started investigating to see if my impressions were supported by facts.

It took a lot of digging. Feminists try to present themselves as a beleaguered minority, surrounded on every side by Neanderthals who constantly preach the inferiority of women, but try to find male chauvinist books and see if you can keep believing that. But I persevered, ordering expensive out of print books, scouring the internet, hunting through long books about neurology and history and so on to find one or two pertinent facts that had been allowed to slip through.

But really, once you allow yourself to question feminist orthodoxy, you suddenly realize that there is not a shred of evidence that female political equality with men is a good thing. When women are allowed to vote, they vote for socialist economics and appeasement foreign policy. When women are allowed to run an institution, such as the school system, it goes to hell. When women are allowed to abandon their families, they do. Every advance of science, art, and thought, with a miniscule handful of exceptions, has been achieved by men. As David Stove put it: “Now, Christianity has sometimes made its way, sometimes without obstacles, sometimes even with obstacles; whereas the supposed equal intellectual capacity of women has never made its way, with or even without obstacles. Yet female intellectual capacity has obviously been tried in a far greater number of cases, and in a far wider variety of circumstances, than Christianity.”

One of the male chauvinist books I read (I’m sorry, I don’t remember which) had a good example. For thousands of years, babies were delivered by midwives. Women had complete control of this profession. It never even occurred to the men who ruled the societies to interfere with midwifery. None of these women with the freedom and opportunity for hands-on experience invented the forceps. Instead, a man named Peter Chamberlen invented them around 1600, when the idea of male doctors delivering babies was still a controversial idea, and one chiefly engaged in by the decadent rich. In other words, men had scarcely arrived on the scene before they were inventing things that women had not imagined in thousands of years.

There are exceptions to this general rule, yes. There are a small handful of female geniuses who also have the temperament for the hard work necessary for great achievements. But the vast majority of women do not. They will be mediocre in the workplace. And unless she is curing cancer, every woman will be making a far more important contribution to society by giving birth to and loving a child than she could ever possibly make in the workplace.

We have now had forty years of feminism. Are people happier? Is the economy healthier? Is crime lower? Is the world a more peaceful place? Have racism, poverty, and dictatorship in the world decreased? Are children better educated? The answer is a resounding no. Feminism has been an unqualified disaster.

The 1920’s-1950’s era is the one in which humans came the closest to getting it right, except that women were allowed to vote. But women were sensibly barred from serving on juries in most places. Women were allowed to own and control property. It was understood that most women would be full-time wives and mothers, but those who didn’t have a husband to support them (often because they were widowed), or those few who genuinely felt the desire and had the ability to pursue a professional career, could and did. Society still had sufficiently strong disapprobation of promiscuity, and laws about legitimacy and marriage were still sane enough, that a young woman could even leave her parents’ home and live alone or with other young women without it being assumed that she was a floozy. Times have changed, and not for the better.

To be a misogynist and a male chauvinist is simply to acknowledge the facts of reality. I wish that none of this was true, but the evidence is overwhelming and conclusive. There is not one speck of evidence that feminism is a good thing. If governments do not resurrect “sexist” policies of the past, the granddaughters of the women who burned their bras will be wearing burquas.

Advertisements

64 Responses to “Why I Am A Male Chauvinist”

  1. Fidelbogen Says:

    You are female, and you seem to have a lower opinion of women than I do. How ironic! If some male commenter appeared on my blog saying the likes of what you are saying, I wouldn’t censor him, but I might counsel him (in a polite way) to govern his tongue a bit.

    At any rate…

    I have just discovered your blog, and I find it good. Very good indeed.

    It is good indeed to hear a WOMAN saying the things that you are saying: just ONE female voice talking in that vein outweighs a thousand male voices, easily!

    And you in particular are most eloquent, with the ideally balanced tone of cool venom which I deem to be the most effective rhetorical method in this case.

    Long story short: If thou shalt link to me, I shall link to thee! 🙂

    http://counterfem.blogspot.com

  2. Fidelbogen Says:

    You are female, and you seem to have a lower opinion of women than I do. How ironic! If some male commenter appeared on my blog saying the likes of what you are saying, I wouldn’t censor him, but I might counsel him (in a polite way) to govern his tongue a bit.

    At any rate…

    I have just discovered your blog, and I find it good. Very good indeed.

    It is good indeed to hear a WOMAN saying the things that you are saying: just ONE female voice talking in that vein outweighs a thousand male voices, easily!

    And you in particular are most eloquent, with the ideally balanced tone of cool venom which I deem to be the most effective rhetorical method in this case.

    Long story short: If thou shalt link to me, I shall link to thee! 🙂

    http://counterfem.blogspot.com

  3. Fidelbogen Says:

    You are female, and you seem to have a lower opinion of women than I do. How ironic! If some male commenter appeared on my blog saying the likes of what you are saying, I wouldn’t censor him, but I might counsel him (in a polite way) to govern his tongue a bit.

    At any rate…

    I have just discovered your blog, and I find it good. Very good indeed.

    It is good indeed to hear a WOMAN saying the things that you are saying: just ONE female voice talking in that vein outweighs a thousand male voices, easily!

    And you in particular are most eloquent, with the ideally balanced tone of cool venom which I deem to be the most effective rhetorical method in this case.

    Long story short: If thou shalt link to me, I shall link to thee! 🙂

    http://counterfem.blogspot.com

  4. Fidelbogen Says:

    Whoops, never mind!

    I just noticed that you already HAVE linked to me!

    Sheesh, I’m blind as a bat!

    My link to you will be installed shortly. . .

  5. Fidelbogen Says:

    Whoops, never mind!

    I just noticed that you already HAVE linked to me!

    Sheesh, I’m blind as a bat!

    My link to you will be installed shortly. . .

  6. Fidelbogen Says:

    Whoops, never mind!

    I just noticed that you already HAVE linked to me!

    Sheesh, I’m blind as a bat!

    My link to you will be installed shortly. . .

  7. Male Chauvinist Woman Says:

    Fidelbogen, thank you for your very flattering comments, and for the link. I have been gaining much enjoyment and edification from your blog!

  8. Male Chauvinist Woman Says:

    Fidelbogen, thank you for your very flattering comments, and for the link. I have been gaining much enjoyment and edification from your blog!

  9. Male Chauvinist Woman Says:

    Fidelbogen, thank you for your very flattering comments, and for the link. I have been gaining much enjoyment and edification from your blog!

  10. Joe Says:

    And unless she is curing cancer, every woman will be making a far more important contribution to society by giving birth to and loving a child than she could ever possibly make in the workplace.
    ——————–

    AMEN.

    this was an excellent post. It is always interesting and insightful to learn why a particular woman comes to despise feminism. Before I ever read “The Manipulated Man” I didn’t even know that there was ever such a thing as a female chauvinist. LIke fidelbogen, I do not go quite as far to call myself a male chauvinist- I just simply shake my head at women and avoid any deep romantic relationships.

    Any, keep up the great work.

  11. Joe Says:

    And unless she is curing cancer, every woman will be making a far more important contribution to society by giving birth to and loving a child than she could ever possibly make in the workplace.
    ——————–

    AMEN.

    this was an excellent post. It is always interesting and insightful to learn why a particular woman comes to despise feminism. Before I ever read “The Manipulated Man” I didn’t even know that there was ever such a thing as a female chauvinist. LIke fidelbogen, I do not go quite as far to call myself a male chauvinist- I just simply shake my head at women and avoid any deep romantic relationships.

    Any, keep up the great work.

  12. Joe Says:

    And unless she is curing cancer, every woman will be making a far more important contribution to society by giving birth to and loving a child than she could ever possibly make in the workplace.
    ——————–

    AMEN.

    this was an excellent post. It is always interesting and insightful to learn why a particular woman comes to despise feminism. Before I ever read “The Manipulated Man” I didn’t even know that there was ever such a thing as a female chauvinist. LIke fidelbogen, I do not go quite as far to call myself a male chauvinist- I just simply shake my head at women and avoid any deep romantic relationships.

    Any, keep up the great work.

  13. Mr Zopo Says:

    You speak the truth. Feminism has done no good to sociey, actuallt it’s destroying the whole civilization. Feminism turned women into selfish sluts who think they’re the center of the universe.
    Feminism is the cancer of society, by the way, here’s a link explaining the similarities between some personality disorders and modern women.
    http://www.nomarriage.com/disorders.html

  14. Mr Zopo Says:

    You speak the truth. Feminism has done no good to sociey, actuallt it’s destroying the whole civilization. Feminism turned women into selfish sluts who think they’re the center of the universe.
    Feminism is the cancer of society, by the way, here’s a link explaining the similarities between some personality disorders and modern women.
    http://www.nomarriage.com/disorders.html

  15. Mr Zopo Says:

    You speak the truth. Feminism has done no good to sociey, actuallt it’s destroying the whole civilization. Feminism turned women into selfish sluts who think they’re the center of the universe.
    Feminism is the cancer of society, by the way, here’s a link explaining the similarities between some personality disorders and modern women.
    http://www.nomarriage.com/disorders.html

  16. El Chauvinisto Says:

    Wow! There may still be hope! Good work, lady.

  17. BlkBond Says:

    I have just discovered your blog through a feminist blog ( I cannot recall which). Your points are valid and logical. Your life is very eye-opening. I think you will receive more credit than any man, because you are saying these things as a woman, whereas when and if a man were to voice these things, he would be labeled 'bitter' or 'hateful'.

    Kudos for the blog, I look forward to reading the entire thing.

    Bond. BlkBond.

  18. Female Misogynist Says:

    BlkBond, welcome! Glad you're enjoying.

    But I assure you, I have still been labelled bitter and hateful, despite being a woman.

  19. Novaseeker Says:

    That's very true — anyone who speaks that truth in this culture is immediately shamed in a transparent attempt to silence them. It's good to see that hasn't worked on you.

  20. David Says:

    Your blog rocks, and you do too.

    I fact, if it wasn't for the fact tht you're a gay, American, rebublican christian; and I'm a straight, married, liberal leaning atheiest from New Zealand; I'd probably propose to you.

  21. Jonna Says:

    I would like some clarification on some points. I stumbled across your blog a while back, and it prompted me to blog about it in return. I have been utterly fascinated by your method of logic and reasoning. I'm not interested in changing your opinion with any sort of facts because underlying attitudes of any sort are difficult if not impossible to change–I don't have that kind of time. I refuse to pick apart your arguments for the same reason, but I must ask, how can you BE a woman and harbor so much hatred/dislike toward them, a trait(women hate other women) that I recall you say (possibly–not for sure, reading your material makes my brain explode) is one common among women? You hate feminism, but have not the strides made by these women in the past made it possible for you to even express your ideas in the present? I don't get it. You bash your own sex for not being on top in the professional world, but couldn't that partially be due to the fact that many are raising families–the very thing you think they should be doing??? And how do you think lesbians would do in a patriarchal society of the past? What would your role be? Where would you fit in? How would you expect to have a family and children without changes that have been made on the backs of the feminists you so despise? I am guessing your parents were divorced, why didn't your father rather than your mother raise you if you think she was unfit? Or just didn't care for her? Not every woman on the planet is cut out to be a mother–some know this and choose not to, where would they fit in, in your scheme of things. A lot of men assume that many women have penis envy, and use this term negatively to describe any woman standing up for what is in her best interest–independence, career, etc. but I have never seen it as obvious in any female as I see it in you. Your hypocrisy seems to know no bounds and it baffles me. My only explanation is that misogyny usually is rooted in a male child's frustration that a woman has power over him in his early years and this is in conflict with his delicate ego. Female children usually do not respond the same way because they identify with their mothers–a way in which a masculine homosexual female child probably does not. I just don't understand how a woman: can so proudly display her hatred/dislike for women by exhibiting traits she says contribute to the reasons she hates/dislikes them, see them as professionally/intellectually inferior throughout history because they are not as prominent/predominant in many fields because they were taking care of babies, husbands, and children–the very thing you say they SHOULD do, and hate the feminist movement when you take for granted the freedoms that their battles have won for you? And a lesbian to boot…can I get a huge, resounding WTF???

  22. Female Misogynist Says:

    Jonna, thanks for that display of female logic. Be sure to tell your fellow feminists that you dutifully recited the cowshit about how feminism won me all sorts of freedoms by raising my taxes, wrecking the school system I had to grow up in, convincing everybody in this country that even the smallest commitment can be tossed aside at whim, abolishing the chivalry that used to keep women safe from violence, and using litigation to force unqualified women into jobs where they can imperil my safety.

    Since you've already imputed all sorts of beliefs to me that I've never expressed, and seem to genuinely believe that I said them, I see no point in trying to answer your ravings. You'll just fantasize that I said something other than what I did again.

    As for being a feminist, it's obvious that you're straight. Nobody can date women without realizing how utterly evil they are.

  23. globalman100 Says:

    "Nobody can date women without realizing how utterly evil they are."
    In Australia we call that a 'pearler' based on the word pearl…it's a real aussie compliment..;-)

    Stupid women like Jonna abound…can you believe on Mens News Daily I was accused of insulting women because I said they had a mental capacity of a 7 to 10 year old boy? Well any 5 year old boy would be ashamed to try on Jonnas 'arguements'..jeez…

    "reading your material makes my brain explode"

    Oh please…if only it were true!!!

    Keep up the good work!!!

  24. Peter C. Says:

    Female Misogynist writes:-
    "If governments do not resurrect "sexist" policies of the past, the granddaughters of the women who burned their bras will be wearing burquas".

    Absolutely. I have said for years that 'history has repeatedly and irrefutably demonstrated that extremism always creates its own antithesis'

    This era of increasingly dishonest, hateful and bizarre feminist zealotry, if it does not come to a dramatic close within the not too distant future, will inevitably result in future generations of women having lost everything – from the vote and access to most areas of further education to possibly even many of their property rights. I am not 'waxing lyrical' or exaggerating.

    I have also said, long before reading this article, that 'feminists are paving a way to a future in which women will be widely looked upon and treated with wary scornful contempt', and that 'many of the most scornful misogynists of the future will be women themselves'.

  25. JamminJessica Says:

    Female, I enjoyed reading your post. Your writing style is very thorough – you do well in balancing a mixture of life experience with logical insight. Even though I'm a straight female, I can identify with a great deal of your experiences.

    Yet while you wax great logical insight in your post, I do find a point of contention that I feel compelled to question you on.

    You compare the experience of dating females to your own dating experiences.

    Yet couldn't the experience of dating lesbians be different from the experience of dating straight females?

    I have a gay male friend and many of his dating tribulations sound exactly like what you experienced with dating gay women. He was routinely cheated on, used by, and stood up by other men.

  26. Female Misogynist Says:

    Jessica, that makes a lot of sense. However, I have reason to believe that my experiences are similar to those of straight men.

    For one thing, whenever I read PUA material, I'm amazed at how much the female behavior they discuss is just like those of my girlfriends. But I dated only very feminine women, so that probably has something to do with it. If I'd dated butch dykes, my experiences would have been different.

    I'm not surprised about your gay male friend. Just as a lot of lesbians (like me) have very masculine personalities, a lot of gay men have strong feminine aspects to their personalities.

    Thanks for your thoughts, and welcome to my blog!

  27. Melanie Says:

    Bravo.Standing ovation to you.

  28. Female Misogynist Says:

    Melanie,Thank you!

  29. SuperDave Says:

    Wow! Spot on commentary and from a woman no less. Women are raised to believe that men exist to serve their needs, financial and other. The arrogance of most women is simply mind blowing as it must be to any mature and rational observer. Years ago I dated a woman who seemed to have her act together. When I broached the subject of her not acting like other women she confessed she actually tried dating women on two occasions and pretty much had the same experience as female misogynist. She said it gave her a whole new perspective and she didn't realize the endless "games and bullshit" men had to put up with just to get laid. Feminism has absolutely nothing to do with fostering the feminine nature of women. The social and political equality of the sexes is just a convenient mask for the naked female chauvinism that that poisonous creed represents.

  30. Gia Says:

    Well, Female Chauvinist, about the thing u said about schools are being run by women because of the prevailing feminist stance of the current society, and how that's being the downfall of the whole schooling system…. which means you're saying feminism is directly contributing to the downfall of the schooling system and making schools unsafe for children, both male and female…… The thing is, u know all this and can form this opinion of yours because u were allowed to go school and get an education in the first place…….. Ironically, if there wasn't feminism from its roots way back in the 18th century to fight for females' rights to go to school and get an education, U AS A FEMALE FROM BIRTH WOULDN'T EVEN HAVE BEEN TO SCHOOL OR KNOW OR EXPERIENCE WHAT IT IS TO BE A STUDENT IN A PUBLIC SCHOOL OR GET AN EDUCATION. Sorry for the capital letters, i just got too emotional, what can i do, i'm just a stupid transsexual female……… I'm saying this cause rich girls were educated at home by parents or governesses whereas poor and even some middle class girls didn't get much of education beyond basic reading, as their value was primarily in child-bearing and also their parents didnt have time to educate them, busy plying their trades and working hard to survive… whereas boys were generally sent to public schools exclusive for boys… more boys went to school than girls admittedly….. Until feminism came along and changed all this, equal education for both sexes.. If there wasn't feminism in the first place…. chances are, you, as a female from birth, wouldn't even have gone to school to be able to form all the opinions you have about feminism destroying the present schooling system, let alone blog about them…. and you will be precious and valuable mostly just for your child-bearing and raising abilities, which means you have to enslave your life as a female to a male, how could you have asserted and acted on your lesbian identity in this situation, Female Misogynist? If you tried to confide your lesbian feelings to any other females in this feminism-absent male chauvinist imaginary situation, the females would have been repulsed by you cause of ur deviation from the patriarchal female norms, that is a female can only form sexual relationships with a male and not another female.. They would have done worse than betraying or cheating on you.. They and all the males would have hanged or imprisoned or sent you to a harsh penal colony for your lesbianism.. And you would have blamed and hated males and patriarchy in the absence of feminism… So, if what u wished really happened, feminism vanishes from the earth's surface, you would have been opposite of what you are now, maybe? perhaps you would have hated males and patriarchy and favoured females and feminism to champion women's rights, which includes your rights, cause you're a woman by present classification? What a complex parody…… Anyways, all this from a completely stupid transsexual female, better known as a transwoman. And one more thing, Female Misogynist, i think you maybe a transsexual man, or a male at heart, have u considered this before?

  31. Female Misogynist Says:

    Gia,I'm just going to deal with one point here: my ability to form an opinion on feminism is not the result of my having received an "education", i.e. been forced at gunpoint to spend every day listening to some feminist bimbo recite Marxist propaganda, read aloud bits from textbooks she couldn't begin to understand, and get beaten up by boys for her amusement. I can form opinions in spite of having received a feminist-era "education", which is designed specifically to make it impossible for anyone to form opinions of their own, but instead to swallow the propaganda they're being fed.My ability to form opinions is the result of my being smart, which is genetic and has nothing to do with how much education I received or the quality thereof.

  32. huxxx Says:

    @Gia – The other thing you gotta understand is that Female Misogynist obviously isn't against the benefits of women having access to education per se, and can quite coherently applaud feminist efforts here (I actually don't know the history of female education, but I'll assume you're correct). Or perhaps she doesn't, I don't know; she has some pretty extreme views.But my point is that she could without being bound to the premise that the current state of schooling is adequate. There is nothing contradictory about supporting opportunity equity in itself while opposing the contingent flaws of the feminine influence on education. There are two different issues here you're not discerning.

  33. Female Misogynist Says:

    @ Huxx,You are right that whether women ought to be educated and whether the current feminist influence on education is a good thing are two entirely different issues, a distinction which Gia and most other critics fail to appreciate.And you are right that I am in favor of women being educated, but feminists have not given us that; instead, as you hint, they have destroyed education for everyone. In the nineteenth century, more extensive education was extended to girls (and to a larger number of boys) mainly out of male generosity. Really, it was the technological advances made by men that led to greater prosperity, making it possible for the majority of children (male and female) to go to school instead of working in the fields or the family business. And none of my studies of history, including the history of early feminism which I studied when I was much younger, have revealed any noble feminist crusades to win education for women. There were a couple of women who founded colleges for women, but it was mainly boys' schools generously opening their doors to girls that made the change.What is certain is that allowing females to take over the teaching profession has damaged it to the point that school is not merely useless, it is actively harmful. College is little better, as the Gramscians have turned universities into feminist institutions, where young people are brainwashed into the progressive, feminist viewpoint in lieu of actually being taught anything. Students can actually major in "Women's Studies", spending years reading feminist propaganda and receiving a so-called degree for it.If schools and universities still taught something other than political correctness, they would be useful institutions, and it would be in society's interest to educate women as well as men. Only in the hard sciences, which not coincidentally are and will always be male dominated, is anything substantive still taught. Thanks to what feminists have done to schools and colleges, the only way to acquire an education is to do it yourself with a library card. But even if education was still useful, feminists still wouldn't deserve any of the credit for it.

  34. globalman100 Says:

    Yep, Gia just provide more evidence that education is wasted on most women. Certainly whatever money was spent on her education was entirely wasted. She is yet to learn the correct spelling of 'you'."I'm just a stupid transsexual female"Yes. You are stupid Gia. And if you are transsexual as you claim you have more than likely been mentally messed up by the Illuminati propaganda pervasive in our society that is intended to confuse people as to their sexuality so they cannot form permanent relationships.

  35. Female Misogynist Says:

    Globalman, that's not necessarily so. There have always been homosexuals and transsexuals throughout history; these things are caused by complex genetic anomalies.Though you are right that the forces of progressive propaganda – I don't believe it's the Illuminati, but Democrats are plenty bad enough – have done their best to promote confusion about sexual identity in those who otherwise wouldn't be confused about it. Still, we can't assume that's the case for every particular example.

  36. globalman100 Says:

    FM,correct, which is why I said 'more than likely' to make sure it was clear I well understood that these things were around for some time. But the Illuminati have also been around the whole time. As far as 'democrats' go? Both political parties, indeed all major corporations and anyone with any power, are bought and sold by the Illuminati. Whether it be from choice or blackmail or anything else. No-one gets very far without playing their game. Henry Makow has proven this as have many others. Just take a look at David Camerons climb down on the EU constitution yesterday. He gave a 'cast iron commitment' to have a referendum on the EU Lisbon Treaty. His cast iron is looking a little rusty today. JFK was the last president who revolted against his bosses. There are some who say Nixon also revolted and that was the reason for watergate but I've not seen evidence of that. Reagan asked too many questions, hardly a revolt, but they shot him anyway. Since he didn't die he got the message. Play ball. Whether people believe the world is running to the depopulation agenda or not is actually not relevant. It is.

  37. Female Misogynist Says:

    Globalman, although you know I don't agree with you, I'm asking this in a respectful way: NWO theorists say that the depopulation agenda has been going on for several decades. But in that time, the population explosion has only continued. Why is this?

  38. globalman100 Says:

    For 10,000 years people have been 'programmed' if you like to have 'lots of children'. We all joke about 'catholics and TVs'. Until 40 years ago women have typically had 4-6 children. Now women are having 1.2 ot 1.7 chiildren on the west. In india women have gone from an average of 6 children in 1970 to 3 children now. There have been approximately 2.2B abortions in the last 40 years. They tried very hard to increase the death rate (cancer etc) and they tried very hard to reduce birth rates (abortion, women into the work force etc.)In Germany birth rates have halved and the population has been in decline for 30 years. It takes a lot to change the programmed attitude of 10,000 years. If you think about it, the turn around has been massive. It is now 'socially acceptable' to kill an unborn child. 40 years ago 'every life was precious' and women were expected to deliver the baby and it was expected to be adopted.If you look how much things have changed globally in just 40 years it really is actually amazing.

  39. VeldanG Says:

    Actually on the note of education.I'd just like to give Gia a big ol' slap around the head.Thanks for coupling truth with a side of omission. While it is true that Females have gained a lot in the way of rights to an education, feminism isn't really the source of this.Whereas only rich daughters were educated and the poor were not, the same can be said for Men. Most boys of the 18th century were given "only as much schooling as they needed". Which usually equated to 4-6 years before they were shipped off to the workforce. Women were treated equally in that they got "as much as they needed" before being shipped off home to learn how to raise a family.This was more just a socially accepted approach, not a definite rule and those wanting to live outside those rules struggled for it, both Men and Women. Feminism didn't shake this ground, but rather the poorer classes realising that greater education lead to greater opportunity for their children would then push to have their children study longer. Before long a government run education system took flight and not until 30-40 years ago was steadily increasing in its quality and length (aka. how long a student would study for in years).As of the birth of modern feminism and modern PC culture we've found a steady decline in education as less Male teachers are in the field and as more irrelevant BS is being taught rather than actual subjects.@ the OP: Much love. A good read and well thought argument of your personal opinions.

  40. VeldanG Says:

    Actually on the note of education.I'd just like to give Gia a big ol' slap around the head.Thanks for coupling truth with a side of omission. While it is true that Females have gained a lot in the way of rights to an education, feminism isn't really the source of this.Whereas only rich daughters were educated and the poor were not, the same can be said for Men. Most boys of the 18th century were given "only as much schooling as they needed". Which usually equated to 4-6 years before they were shipped off to the workforce. Women were treated equally in that they got "as much as they needed" before being shipped off home to learn how to raise a family.This was more just a socially accepted approach, not a definite rule and those wanting to live outside those rules struggled for it, both Men and Women. Feminism didn't shake this ground, but rather the poorer classes realising that greater education lead to greater opportunity for their children would then push to have their children study longer. Before long a government run education system took flight and not until 30-40 years ago was steadily increasing in its quality and length (aka. how long a student would study for in years).As of the birth of modern feminism and modern PC culture we've found a steady decline in education as less Male teachers are in the field and as more irrelevant BS is being taught rather than actual subjects.@ the OP: Much love. A good read and well thought argument of your personal opinions.

  41. Gia Says:

    globalman100, we're ALL stupid in the greater, grander scheme of the existence of the long run. Which means you're stupid as I am, globalman100. If anyone of us are completely 100 percent free from stupidity, surely that one person would have already discovered the cure for AIDS. Which I'm sure you have not done, globalman100. Admitting and acknowledging that we're stupid is the first step towards unstupidi-fying ourselves, and not staying stupid. If you're thinking that there's no such word as unstupidy-fying in the English language, its my own coinage. Like in the medical field, the first step towards recovery is the acknowledgment and non-denial of the symptoms and medical condition by the patient, however much the patient couldn't face the reality of it. The problem in education now is not feminism, its the abandoning by the males of the teaching profession which the males perceive as boring, for other more exciting, adrenaline-pumped profession such as sports, musician-rockers, military, highly powered corporate/business world. Actually, the boredom and monotony of the teaching profession is the third factor. The first factor is is the PAY factor and the second factor is the status factor (like the status you get from being a doctor or engineer, rather than a high school teacher). YES, teaching in schools pays much less than all the profession above. Thats why males abandoned the education/teaching field and left it to the females. And when they abandoned the education field, they also abandoned the young boys who should have been their wards, young males whom they should have mentored. Ironically, in the high paying university faculties positions – professors, etc, most of the positions are taken by males, except maybe in the faculties of humanities (humanities as a subject is too boring for males). Why couldn't feminism wrest these educational positions in universities from the males, as well and give it to the females just like feminism did in the schooling institutions (the females would love to be professors rather than school teachers, its much high paying) This shows that males are motivated by money, and all the current pattern and problems in the world is shaped by their drive and pursuit of….money. If males are so noble and strong and feels so much for their fellow males regarding the wrong doings of the female-controlled schooling institutions towards them, and simultaneously, if the females are so weak and pathetic and crusable, wahts (i know that the correct spelling is "what's") stopping the males from wresting back the lower educational institutions/schools from the females and putting the females back where they belong (at home?) just to save all the young males (and also females) from this doom that feminism is causing? Why can't more males apply for teaching jobs in schools, or if that doesn't work, just march up to schools and demand that they take charge of the education of young children, and start teaching right away? Stage a mass protest in front of schools against feminism's control of schools…. Why haven't males done that, yet? Is it that most males in USA don't care as much as the males who posts in this blog cares for this subject? Surely the above suggestions are more practical, peaceful and less hateful as a solution rather than condemning ALL females in such a degrading way in this blog for quite a small problem like this, which is not a solution at all (if you're doing it for fun and to just to hurt females, then, I won't ever visit this blog again). After all, some others have much horrendous problems, those stuck in wars, starving to death, tortured to death. And thank you for clarifying my and everybody's transsexuality to globalman100, Female Misogynist. That's my real face, a skull.

  42. Gia Says:

    Fine, lets look at some real-life example. Lets look at an educational model which is truly absent of feminine influence and feminism, an educational model that upholds patriarchy and masculine values to the utmost, which might sound very ideal to the males who posts in this blog – the Taliban education system, which bans all females from participating in it, both in the giving and receiving end. This Taliban model of education is fully male dominated as what the feminism haters of this blog wish the USA education system would be. Is the Taliban education system any better than the USA education system? P.S I'm from Malaysia, a Muslim country.

  43. globalman100 Says:

    Gia,you must be female. Not a rational thought in your whole diatribe."The problem in education now is not feminism, its the abandoning by the males of the teaching profession which the males perceive as boring."Sorry. Men were pushed out of the educational system by a mix of real and threatened discrimination. It was very common for men to be accused of 'sexual harassment' by spiteful female students wishing to show their 'power' over the male teacher. Their hands were also tied by the feminist idea that children can not be subject to corporal punishment, especially boys. Men did not abandon teaching. They were actively pushed out by the guvment. It was necessary to push men out of the teaching profession in order to corrupt it and have the brainless stupid women teachers be prepared to force feed the young boys their New World Order propaganta. If we win this battle, women will never again be allowed to teach a child male or female. Women have proven they are not up to handing such responsibility. Women are children. And you do not let children teach children unless you want to destroy the education system and teach propaganda instead…which is exactly what they have done.The rest of your post is such crap it's not worth addressing. Thanks for demonstrating how stupid you are.

  44. Deborah Says:

    "Then there's the many female friends who turned on me for the most incredibly superficial reasons."I know what you mean. Even as a straight female this happened to me time and time again, mainly because I was not interested in playing social hierarchy or gossip games.Growing, there was only one female that I did not keep at arms length. She was my best friend. She was the only female who I could tell my secrets, didn't gossip about me when I wasn't around, and showed genuine concern for my well being. After eight years of friendship, she confided to me, in high school, that she was Gay.

  45. Olive Jones Says:

    Your blog is very interesting. I basically agree with much of what you say but I am not so down on women. You are very angry.What I don't understand is … if you see so much of these character flaws in women, why would you want to be with one as a life partner? Why don't you want to be with a man? Is it because you think you have to play the role of a "female" in order to be with a man as a mate? If you have already stated the reason somewhere on your blog, then I apologize, I have not read it entirely yet. I am interested in why in the world you wouldn't want to be with a man.

  46. Female Misogynist Says:

    Olive,Thank you for your comments!I've actually been celibate for several years, and expect to remain so. I'm still gay, just like a heterosexual who doesn't date or have sex is still straight.I would have liked to have a woman for a life partner, but feminism has ruined them. So I have resigned myself to the single life.Men are certainly more likely to be able to sustain a relationship, but I'm *gay*. The idea of having sex with a man… just, no. Basically, I don't do it for the same reason the male MRAs in my blogroll don't. Just because we don't think much of the current crop of women doesn't mean we can turn on to men.Anyway, welcome, and I hope you enjoy the blog!

  47. Gia Says:

    Globalman100, you're the one who's really stupid. Following your rationale of :"If we win this battle, women will never again be allowed to teach a child male or female" I would love to help you out on materialising this vision of yours. Maybe you should just build up a radical team of female teachers exterminators made up of males who thinks like you and go around KILLING every single female teachers in USA. I mean, taking out EVERY single female teachers who's there in USA, taht (that) would be millions, not just a few dozens of female teachers in your neighbourhood or something. If you don't kill all of them, there's no point of killing any of them, cause there'll still be some of those pesky (pesky by your logics, not mine) female teachers around in the USA education system. Can you do that, get rid of ALL female teachers in USA, seriously?"If we win this battle, women will never again be allowed to teach a child male or female" How the fuck are you gonna do that, dumbass stupid ignorant not-grounded-to-reality globalman100. Before winning the battle, how're you even gonna start the battle in the first place? What kinda battle it will be? Have you gotten down the detailed blueprint of the battle on paper (or in your computer)? Is it going be like the holocaust of the Nazi? Are you gonna send all the female teachers to the gas chambers, starve them, make them do heavy labour, shoot them, hang them, rape them, cut them up and torture them? And you think the rest of the world will just keep quiet and won't react to it? Why don't you ever learn from history, globalman100?. At the height of the Holocaust, Hitler predicted that there won't be anymore Jews or coloured people in the world sometime in the future, maybe in the year of 2050 or something. Instead, the president of America ended up being black, now. Why don't you ever realise that you can never exclude, enslave or get rid of a whole section of living population in a totalitarian, forceful way like Hitler and the white slave owners tried to do? "Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it"That's a quote from George Santayana, the philosopher. He's a male, I'm sure you would listen to him, if you wouldn't listen to me. Anyways, there's a movie about a woman who was abused by her husband for many years (14?) and then she couldn't take it anymore, she poured gasoline on him when he was sleeping and set him on fire and killed him, they had two kids, two boys. The film's title is "Provoked" and the woman's character is played by Aiswarya Rai. If you push around female teachers too much and engage a battle against them, they may retaliate like the woman in the film.

  48. globalman100 Says:

    Gia,you call me stupid yet you have posted nothing but rubbish. The MEN here, and FM, know I have not called for killing women, even feminised women, though your maasters in the Illuminati are killing women in their millions.I simply said that women will never again be allow to teach a child, male or female. The reason for this is that women are not capable of teaching and they have proven that by being put in charge of classrooms all around the western world.Make no mistake. If us good men defeat the Illuminati you women will be 3rd class citizens after our dogs.If we lose you will be killed or enslaved. The future options for women are terrible. And they are well deserved because of the disgraceful behaviour of western women these last 40 years.

  49. globalman100 Says:

    Olive,"You are very angry"As a typical woman you have confused statements of truth with 'anger'. FM is not 'angry' she is simply saying western women are not worth dating. And I agree. I only date eastern european women because western women are totally crap now.I am not 'angry' at that. Western women are a small minority that could be dead in a ditch for all I care. What you call 'anger' is actually 'indifference'.

  50. Olive Jones Says:

    FM,You have a right to be angry about all the things you claim to be angry about. What I want to say to you is this, what I have observed so far in my journey through this life.I do not believe in the "born-that-way" theory. Homosexuals and lesbians are mostly created by nurture, not born. Our traumas come out in all areas of our lives, the most powerful of those is sexual expression. Sexuality is expressed through individuals and through cultures. It is the left-brain/right-brain dichotomy of looking at the world that is gender, culture and religion. Muslim men need to dominate and debase women, because a woman stripped them of their manhood (sMOTHER-love) and/or not having a real man for a father but a sex dependant needy addict for a father, so he needs to confirm his manhood with his dick. It is the same with a gay man, except he seeks the man he never bonded with through sex with other men, and is constantly disappointed, because all he finds are other women inside there, not the man he seeks. Hence, the huge promiscuity among them.Feminists need to dominate and debase men, or at least, the spirit of men. These women had either overpowering, aloof fathers who gave them no love or identity or or weak, booze-addicted, sex-addicted men. They need to be the man, they pretend to be men but cannot be.A gay co-worker and I shared our experiences once. I told him at puberty I was very angry, my father was super-macho and emotionally unavailable to me so I looked for this nurturing man-spirit that daughters need to balance them through promiscuous sex with much older men. His father was an alcoholic, unavailable to him, and at puberty began to look for sex from older men also. He was seeking the identity, the male father-bond he never had. He told me he wished he had an older brother, an uncle, older cousin growing up. But he insists he was "born-that-way." This is the Great Lie of our time. Say this, and all hell breaks loose. Even without scientific proof. The spirit of men evolved the left brain. The spirit of women evolved the right brain. This is how we evolved to meet the need of the survival of the species, physical and emotional. That doesn't mean men have to be the all macho He-man or women need to be the dumb bimbo. These are the extreme characters of our culture. We are evolving.The problem I have with homosexuality is that it is a false identity created out of trauma. And it is illogical. It is against the healthy continuation of the species. People will argue that there is homosexuality found in animals, but this is a false analogy: an animal will hump anything, your leg, because it feels good. We have a conscience and higher faculties. And perhaps there is some physical component … they say having alot of sons deprives the latter sons of testoterone, or maybe a woman has more of her share … I don't know. But I don't think physicality need dominate Spirit. I don't know, this is just my take.You see alot, FM, you are veryu perceptive and honest. I just feel in your anger, you have become traumitized and unbalanced. The anger emotion can block important revelation. I hope, somehow, this new year you will find yourself less angry.

  51. Olive Jones Says:

    @globalman100"I only date eastern european women because western women are totally crap now."You abandon the one that needs you most. If you were a real man, you could tame that confused angry shrew, and maybe you would have a REAL person to be with instead of a sex toy who does your every bidding and makes you FEEL like a man (ooooh, you so smart honey) instead of actually BEING one. A real man is a wonderful spiritual gift. And so is a real woman.

  52. Female Misogynist Says:

    Olive,You are full of shit. Your theories on why people become man-haters or woman-haters are nonsense, and all homosexuality is genetically based. Unless, of course, all discoveries in genetics and neurology over the last two decades are just made up.

  53. globalman100 Says:

    "If you were a real man, you could tame that confused angry shrew"Olive, brainless unthinking and stupid cunts like you demonstrate exactly why I could not bother dating western women. In this statement you are implying that the woman is not responsible for her own actions and must be 'tamed' by a 'real man'. So much for how 'equal' women are and how 'independent' they are. You are confirming my assertion that women are children and will not be held accountable for their own actions and required a man to be responsible for them. And young men who read your comment will see this. And by the way, eastern women similarly need to be 'tamed' by a man but they are honest and open about it and happy to say so and then happy to be dependent on a strong man how supports them and provides for them. One of my girlfriends has actually told me she expects her man to 'stomp on her and put her in her place' on a reguler basis otherwise she gets right out of control. She knows it. She knows she needs a firm hand, and she loves it when a man provides that 'firm hand'.

  54. globalman100 Says:

    "maybe you would have a REAL person to be with instead of a sex toy who does your every bidding and makes you FEEL like a man"FM/Gents, notice how Olive talks down to and criticises eastern women. She claims that if I had put in the effort to 'tame the confused and angry shrew' then I might have a 'REAL person to be with' instead of a 'sex toy who does my every bidding'. That is so funny as to be hysterical. For some reason the eastern women I date are not 'real people', they are some kind of sub-human female when compared to my 'angry shrew' of a wife. And for some reason I should not be seeking women who do all that they can to please me, as I wish, but rather I should be 'taming the angry shrew'. For fucks sake how stupid can western women be? I just spent three days with two of my girlfriends. They know about each other and they are competing for my time and attention. Yes. They do pretty much everything I ask and treat me like a king, and I treat them like my queen. We all know and understand the situation and we are all happy about it. I know that they are each dating other guys as well. It's called 'being an adult' which Olive is clearly not.And far from merely being 'sex toys' one of them bought me a german-english dictionary and spent hours with me teaching me some new words in german. She is presenting herself as someone who has a genuine interest in being supportive of what I am doing and not merely a 'sex toy'. Now. I wonder which type of woman I would prefer? Western women claim I have no right to choose women I prefer because I must be fored to 'tame the angry shrew'. Well fuck off Olive and the tens of millions like her. I will only deal with women who know they are subservient to me and know they have to win my approval. My ex presented herself like this but then used the legal system to abuse me rather than treat me as she had promised at our wedding. In case Olive has never heard a wedding vow it is 'to Love and Honour'. Not 'be and angry shrew to be tamed'.

  55. Olive Jones Says:

    FM,I have never found scientific evidence that homosexuals are genetically disposed. I do know that it is not politically correct to disagree with the common-day mantra of "born-that-way" and it provokes much anger. Believe me, if proof were actually found that homosexuals were nurtured, it would never make it past the lab. But I don't need the proof; I have eyes to see. I know dysfunction and illogic when I see it.

  56. Kinderling Says:

    Oh pleeze Female Misogynist provided links to this genetic evidence you have so I may have a Gay daughter and Gay son. I know Deaf lesbians in their enlightenment produced Deaf children to maintain their culture.http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/1916462.stmYou will really go up in my estimation when you do. I'm sorry to have thought it was all about Dykes and Fems.

  57. Richard Ford Says:

    Olive,I assume you have never met a central european woman or you would not make such racist comments about them.The really attractive thing about them is their strength. They actualy DO THINGS. This is the ultimate turn on for a man who has spent a lifetime listening to westen women whine and make excuses.The thing feminist just cannot get is that we are sick of you because of your pathetic weakness, helplessnes and basic uselessnes.

  58. Suigintou Says:

    I believe the problem isn't one gender or another being better or worse per se, but the fact that most people are so limited, in their souls, consciences, intelligence, whatever you want to call it, that they become selfish assholes who follow their instincts to harm others. There are a lot of asshole males out there. There are wife-beaters, males unable to feel empathy, males who steal and abuse children, who cannot resist pressing whatever advantage they may have over others, who just suck in general. What's happening in this part of the blogosphere is that the intelligent people, who are fed up with dealing with all the idiots out there, are posting their experiences and assuming that they're the only ones who have this kind of interpersonal difficulty.I wish that people were kind, loyal, and smart like you seem to be from your posts, Chauvinist. In fact, I think the world would be better if everyone was one gender, and everyone was like you and a few other people I've met in the past (both male and female) who are likewise fed up with dating and the way human sexuality works. Who just want a partner who isn't going to reward kindness with revulsion, or try to dominate them.We have to realize that humanity is just another animal. Being a member of this species is to be cursed with the intelligence to pretend to be virtuous and good while following one's baser instincts, and (at least some of us) with the sense of right and wrong to feel sick at the selfishness of others.tl;dr: PEOPLE SUCK!

  59. globalman100 Says:

    Richard,"The thing feminist just cannot get is that we are sick of you because of your pathetic weakness, helplessnes and basic uselessnes."I absolutely back that up. I am totally sick of western feminised women. For some reason they believe I must be forced to associate with them and pay for them. No.

  60. Syanara Says:

    Lots of hate here. Kind of Sad to see.First and 2nd wave feminism was fine(imo), regardless of wether it was males, or females that encouraged it. Removing 50% of our human populations capacity to vote, will result in what it has alway's resulted in and that is an imbalance of power, and abuse by those in power. I can give you examples if you'd like. If EITHER males or females, end up in a position of power without any counterpart, you end up with problems. Yes, males achieved a great deal in the past, they also caused many, many problems. If females ruled, exactly the same thing would happen.If it wasn't for a push for equality, I would spend my life cleaning floors and washing clothes. Considering that women are now(sucessfully) running their own business(Amongst many other things) and many males and females ARE happy in marriages and relationships, it's fairly obvious that the female mind is capable of more than frivalous duties and equality has not destroyed all human relationships. Things are not as black and white as you claim, and you are attempting to simplify a very complex problem in human society. When people do this(Simplify), it is usually a result of laziness in thinking and an inability to work through emotional hurt. Nothing is ever simple.I will agree that 3rd wave feminism, or at least the last 20-30 years has been hugely problematic but the primary reason for this, is the belief that equality MEANS we are the same. We are not. Men and women are different. I'm sorry that you have been hurt by women, but you display the same characteristics as most mysogynists. You want the "feminine" female to love you, and yet she does not. You do not understand her, so you blame her.You still crave this type of woman, but hate her at the same time. For male mysogynists, it is usually this "need" for female love makes them feel..out of control and unable to feel like a masculine male. You cannot expect a woman to love you, if you do not understand them, and learn to actually like them for who they are, and not what you want them to be.Same goes for the women, who hate men.

  61. solaris Says:

    The part of this blog entry about the modern dating game really rang true for me. There are some absolute nutballs out there who won't hesitate to bring the crazy. Thanks for an insightful post.

  62. Chris Says:

    Let me ask you FM, as there are a couple of posts here that provoke my question….Why do women seem to read the words ALL or NONE in gender discourse when they arent there at all? Or maybe a better question, why do women consider the comment "not ALL xyz are abc…" to be refutation of xyz BEING abc?The obligatory woman posted here that not ALL women are such and such and SOME men are such and such. If you are the masculine/feminine equivalent of the vampire Daywalker (you can move between the two realms of thought)…can you dip into that manner of thinking and explain that for me?Also, when men come in and try and issue Rodney King esque "why dont we all get along" crap, is that not the grown up version of what was a verbal bra unfastener for teen boys when they'd say "Im not like other guys"?

  63. globalman100 Says:

    "If females ruled, exactly the same thing would happen."Actually. No. It would not. Whenever females rule chaos and collapse follows and they live in the stone age. No female led society made it out of the stone age and those that became 'female dominated' collapsed. Case closed. Women do not belong in political power.

  64. Billy Says:

    Excellent post FM@ Syanara"You cannot expect a woman to love you, if you do not understand them, and learn to actually like them for who they are, and not what you want them to be."But if you understand them and understand that they aren't capable of love anymore than a wild bore is capable of bringing your slippers in the evening after cooking you an enjoyable dinner then you are ahead of the game and decide you are better off alone.According to your twisted view we must learn to love the lying, cheating whores in our lives no matter what they do and somehow that will make us happy because they can never be anything we really want in a spouse or partner?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: