Women and War

I’m sure you’ve all gathered by now that I am rather a hawk. I am very pro-military and pretty much pro-war. We could argue about individual wars, but to take the present conflicts as an example: whether you think the invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan were a good idea or not, they were a direct reaction to terrorism. Terrorism would not exist had women not been allowed to take part in government and turn a large percentage of adult males into manginas. If America and Europe were still ruled by men, not women and manginas, the very first forays into terrorism by Mohammedans, the IRA, etc. would have been firmly crushed instead of coddled and indulged, and the problem would have been nipped in the bud. The present U.S. involvement in the Middle East would never have been even considered. The feminists who are bitching about it have only themselves to blame.

Of course, feminists adore terrorists because women cannot help responding to real men. They know that the men around them have been castrated, by themselves, and can’t be relied upon to defend them from virile Muslims, by their own fault. The fact that feminists are themselves responsible for this does not change their allegiance. They know that when the Muslim invasion of the U.S. begins in earnest, the Muslims will follow the tradition of time immemorial: kill the men and spare most of the women so they can rape them and then order them to cook dinner. The feminists who currently holler for the police or the courts if a man dares to speak to them will eagerly spread their legs for terrorists; only traditional, Christian, nonfeminist women will have the character to resist them – and they will probably lose their lives for it. Feminists are supporting terrorists because they know that this is their best chance of survival. The net result of feminism will probably be that women succeeded in undermining one male regime so that another male regime could take over.

But I am straying from my point, which is more in the line of the lack of female education. I was just reading something that mentioned in passing that in Europe a few centuries ago, most women had no idea why their countries were at war with the Turks or whoever, and often got sulky about having to do without their husbands for the duration. They genuinely had no idea that if their husbands hadn’t left them to bear arms, they would have found themselves as spoils of war for far less pleasant men. The female intellect is, in general, more limited than the male, but women of that time were kept so ignorant that they knew nothing about whatever wars occurred except that it inconvenienced them. Probably their menfolk didn’t want to scare them and so refrained from telling them about the horrible things that would have happened to them if the men didn’t go to war.

In other words, women were mouthing tripe about war being “meaningless” and it being “dying for nothing” and other such crap centuries before the hippies were. And it is from them, these uninformed, self-serving bimbos, that the hippies got their philosophy of pacifism.

The problem is that this didn’t change before women were allowed to take part in government. When women were first granted the vote, most schools were not co-ed. This was of course a good thing, but in this instance it backfired. Boys had learned the truth about the harsh sacrifices which must be made for good men to defend the innocent from bad men, about the horrors visited upon nations which do not defend themselves, and so on. Girls had learned to paint china. Suddenly these china-painters were allowed to make decisions about running and defending the nation. How could this not have ended in disaster?

I am not implying that if women were properly educated, that is, instructed in the fashion and subjects that boys were before women destroyed the Western educational system, that women would then be fit to take part in government. There is still the innate feminine nature that makes women unsuited for such responsibility. Women cannot help being cowards because nature made them too weak to defend themselves, so they will not fight when fighting is required. Women cannot help surrendering to any man with sufficient force or status because nature programmed them to do this to ensure the survival of their offspring. Women cannot help being fickle and dishonest because in terms of survival, honesty and principle have always been things women could not afford.

I am simply making the point that much of today’s corruption has been caused by unleashing a population which is not only biologically inferior, but was also educated in a fashion that made that inferiority even greater than nature intended. Perhaps even patriarchies ought to take care to educate girls as well as it does boys, so that if some fool allows women access to the corridors of power again, the results will be somewhat less disastrous.

Advertisements

15 Responses to “Women and War”

  1. Artfldgr Says:

    excellent!

    i might not agree with it all, but at least its thinking and not parroting. 🙂

    try this for a bit of ire, http://www.gnosticliberationfront.com/bella_dodd_school_of_darkness.htm

    gives a bit more perspective on some of the origins…

    its a bit off topic for the great post, so sorry about that. but its not off topic towards your commentary as to womens complicity and key role in regime change.

    right now you can go over to here:
    islamineurope.blogspot.com/2008/06/brussels-less-and-less-women-on-street.html

    they are discussing similar to your point… except while yours is theory for near future america, the stuff your hinting at is happening for years already in europe hidden by hate speech laws.

    natasha is a militant radical lesbian feminist and a great example of the duplicity, the ignorance an so forth.

    so again i am sorry to be a bit off topic, but i think you might find some more fodder there.

  2. Artfldgr Says:

    excellent!

    i might not agree with it all, but at least its thinking and not parroting. 🙂

    try this for a bit of ire, http://www.gnosticliberationfront.com/bella_dodd_school_of_darkness.htm

    gives a bit more perspective on some of the origins…

    its a bit off topic for the great post, so sorry about that. but its not off topic towards your commentary as to womens complicity and key role in regime change.

    right now you can go over to here:
    islamineurope.blogspot.com/2008/06/brussels-less-and-less-women-on-street.html

    they are discussing similar to your point… except while yours is theory for near future america, the stuff your hinting at is happening for years already in europe hidden by hate speech laws.

    natasha is a militant radical lesbian feminist and a great example of the duplicity, the ignorance an so forth.

    so again i am sorry to be a bit off topic, but i think you might find some more fodder there.

  3. Artfldgr Says:

    excellent!

    i might not agree with it all, but at least its thinking and not parroting. 🙂

    try this for a bit of ire, http://www.gnosticliberationfront.com/bella_dodd_school_of_darkness.htm

    gives a bit more perspective on some of the origins…

    its a bit off topic for the great post, so sorry about that. but its not off topic towards your commentary as to womens complicity and key role in regime change.

    right now you can go over to here:
    islamineurope.blogspot.com/2008/06/brussels-less-and-less-women-on-street.html

    they are discussing similar to your point… except while yours is theory for near future america, the stuff your hinting at is happening for years already in europe hidden by hate speech laws.

    natasha is a militant radical lesbian feminist and a great example of the duplicity, the ignorance an so forth.

    so again i am sorry to be a bit off topic, but i think you might find some more fodder there.

  4. Male Chauvinist Woman Says:

    Art, thank you for the links! I actually heard about Bella Dodd once before. As for the Islam-in-Europe post, I am only too familiar with this attitude. It will spread, I know.

    I sometimes think that the people behind this are deliberately fanning the flames of racism for their own nefarious ends. I’m not a racist, but I can quite understand people who have become so after seeing persons of color get away with crimes in the name of reparations or some such baloney.

    I had a chance to visit Europe this fall, but I didn’t, frankly because I’m scared to. I know it can’t always be as horrible as the article you linked, but some of the time it is, and I’ve never been lucky.

  5. Male Chauvinist Woman Says:

    Art, thank you for the links! I actually heard about Bella Dodd once before. As for the Islam-in-Europe post, I am only too familiar with this attitude. It will spread, I know.

    I sometimes think that the people behind this are deliberately fanning the flames of racism for their own nefarious ends. I’m not a racist, but I can quite understand people who have become so after seeing persons of color get away with crimes in the name of reparations or some such baloney.

    I had a chance to visit Europe this fall, but I didn’t, frankly because I’m scared to. I know it can’t always be as horrible as the article you linked, but some of the time it is, and I’ve never been lucky.

  6. Male Chauvinist Woman Says:

    Art, thank you for the links! I actually heard about Bella Dodd once before. As for the Islam-in-Europe post, I am only too familiar with this attitude. It will spread, I know.

    I sometimes think that the people behind this are deliberately fanning the flames of racism for their own nefarious ends. I’m not a racist, but I can quite understand people who have become so after seeing persons of color get away with crimes in the name of reparations or some such baloney.

    I had a chance to visit Europe this fall, but I didn’t, frankly because I’m scared to. I know it can’t always be as horrible as the article you linked, but some of the time it is, and I’ve never been lucky.

  7. Artfldgr Says:

    I sometimes think that the people behind this are deliberately fanning the flames of racism for their own nefarious ends

    want proof?

    read about the highlander school and the tusckeegee event with an eye on following the money.

    the tuskeegee event is someting that the left loves to soil the US with. but who funded it. the man running sears who wanted communism, funded it. and what race were the doctors providing treatement?

    well he also funded the highlander school which was cloed for sedition eventually. the school trained martin luthor king and rosa parks, and even pete seeger.

    hwoever, the men runing it were part of anotehr commnist front. this front took money and purchased homes in the deep south.

    then surprise they gave the homes to black leftist families who didnt know they were bieng used.

    then they had protests and everthing abotu the blacks moving in and so far… and when the south turned out not to be racist they had to cahnge that history.

    so they planted bombs and blew up the black families, and lynched a few kids. they served i nprison for it, but ultimately we forgot the link but rembered (with help of other groups in press and schools) to define the whites in the south as all racist.

    at the time this created hatred to them and they thought that they would be racist… after all, it was the wkkk that became feminsitm later, and sangers negro project to exterminate them also.

    there si a lot of stuff known now that we beleive to be different. but its false…

    communist sympathizers funded tuskeegee and use that thing they did to hurt us now later..

    they funded highlander… they funded rap, the poetry of h rap brown. they put 4 times the number of abortion clinics in black naeighborhoods, and they accept donations to pay specifically for black babies. (waht a trip to hear the tapes and realize taht by doing things this way, racist rich people could donate 100k to planned parenthood twards racial extermination, and get an award for a social good!! helping out the poor girls of the black community!)

    so look arodun… there is plenty of evidence that since russia was created and moved inot the world sphere, nothing natural has ever happenedf again… even if natural, something else unnatural effects it.

  8. Artfldgr Says:

    I sometimes think that the people behind this are deliberately fanning the flames of racism for their own nefarious ends

    want proof?

    read about the highlander school and the tusckeegee event with an eye on following the money.

    the tuskeegee event is someting that the left loves to soil the US with. but who funded it. the man running sears who wanted communism, funded it. and what race were the doctors providing treatement?

    well he also funded the highlander school which was cloed for sedition eventually. the school trained martin luthor king and rosa parks, and even pete seeger.

    hwoever, the men runing it were part of anotehr commnist front. this front took money and purchased homes in the deep south.

    then surprise they gave the homes to black leftist families who didnt know they were bieng used.

    then they had protests and everthing abotu the blacks moving in and so far… and when the south turned out not to be racist they had to cahnge that history.

    so they planted bombs and blew up the black families, and lynched a few kids. they served i nprison for it, but ultimately we forgot the link but rembered (with help of other groups in press and schools) to define the whites in the south as all racist.

    at the time this created hatred to them and they thought that they would be racist… after all, it was the wkkk that became feminsitm later, and sangers negro project to exterminate them also.

    there si a lot of stuff known now that we beleive to be different. but its false…

    communist sympathizers funded tuskeegee and use that thing they did to hurt us now later..

    they funded highlander… they funded rap, the poetry of h rap brown. they put 4 times the number of abortion clinics in black naeighborhoods, and they accept donations to pay specifically for black babies. (waht a trip to hear the tapes and realize taht by doing things this way, racist rich people could donate 100k to planned parenthood twards racial extermination, and get an award for a social good!! helping out the poor girls of the black community!)

    so look arodun… there is plenty of evidence that since russia was created and moved inot the world sphere, nothing natural has ever happenedf again… even if natural, something else unnatural effects it.

  9. Artfldgr Says:

    I sometimes think that the people behind this are deliberately fanning the flames of racism for their own nefarious ends

    want proof?

    read about the highlander school and the tusckeegee event with an eye on following the money.

    the tuskeegee event is someting that the left loves to soil the US with. but who funded it. the man running sears who wanted communism, funded it. and what race were the doctors providing treatement?

    well he also funded the highlander school which was cloed for sedition eventually. the school trained martin luthor king and rosa parks, and even pete seeger.

    hwoever, the men runing it were part of anotehr commnist front. this front took money and purchased homes in the deep south.

    then surprise they gave the homes to black leftist families who didnt know they were bieng used.

    then they had protests and everthing abotu the blacks moving in and so far… and when the south turned out not to be racist they had to cahnge that history.

    so they planted bombs and blew up the black families, and lynched a few kids. they served i nprison for it, but ultimately we forgot the link but rembered (with help of other groups in press and schools) to define the whites in the south as all racist.

    at the time this created hatred to them and they thought that they would be racist… after all, it was the wkkk that became feminsitm later, and sangers negro project to exterminate them also.

    there si a lot of stuff known now that we beleive to be different. but its false…

    communist sympathizers funded tuskeegee and use that thing they did to hurt us now later..

    they funded highlander… they funded rap, the poetry of h rap brown. they put 4 times the number of abortion clinics in black naeighborhoods, and they accept donations to pay specifically for black babies. (waht a trip to hear the tapes and realize taht by doing things this way, racist rich people could donate 100k to planned parenthood twards racial extermination, and get an award for a social good!! helping out the poor girls of the black community!)

    so look arodun… there is plenty of evidence that since russia was created and moved inot the world sphere, nothing natural has ever happenedf again… even if natural, something else unnatural effects it.

  10. Mr Zopo Says:

    I’ve read somewhere that women are naturaly amoral, what do you think about this theory?
    By the way, I agree that was is good when necessary.

  11. Mr Zopo Says:

    I’ve read somewhere that women are naturaly amoral, what do you think about this theory?
    By the way, I agree that was is good when necessary.

  12. Mr Zopo Says:

    I’ve read somewhere that women are naturaly amoral, what do you think about this theory?
    By the way, I agree that was is good when necessary.

  13. MarkyMark Says:

    FM,

    I come to your blog in search of interesting, out of the box things to read, and you NEVER disappoint! I almost always learn something; I ALWAYS think when I come here! This was one of your best posts yet…

    Unfortunately, back when your ‘ancestors’ Stanton & Anthony were around, it wasn’t KNOWN that lesbians were wired differently. A century later, we know that lesbians such as Stanton & Anthony have more testosterone, which makes them more MALE in their temperament, thought process, and approach to life. This mistake many humans make is assuming that others think & feel as they do; they mistakenly think that others see the world as they do. Ergo, we had feminism.

    Unfortunately for humanity, the Elites (who I call The Puppet Masters, for that is what they are) subverted feminism, using it for their own, nefarious ends. If you look at Betty Friedan’s history, you’ll see that she was a card carrying MEMBER of CPUSA-as in COMMUNIST Party, USA…

    Why did the Commies use feminism? One, because their previous attempts at subversion didn’t work. Two, in order for the State to achieve primacy (a core tenet of communism), the family had to be destroyed.

    During the Great Depression, the Commies TRIED to take advantage of the situation. Why wouldn’t they? You had >25% of employees out of work, not to mention a vast majority of people living in near poverty conditions; the environment was RIPE for exploitation-at least on the surface. Unfortunately for the Commies and fortunately for everyone else, even though labor had just finished fighting management for better pay & working conditions prior to the Great Depression, union men were smart enough to know that communism was NOT the answer; the communists had their nefarious aims thwarted.

    Ah, but the communists are nothing if not persistent; they NEVER give up in trying to achieve their goals-never! You have to get them that…

    So, they went back to Square One; they wanted to take another run at subverting America and her way of life? What to do? Hijack the feminist movement, that’s what!

    So they did just that. Only the communists REALLY behind the feminist movement called it “women’s liberation”-wow! That was smart when you think about it. After all, the root word for liberation is liberty, and the three fundamental rights found in The Declaration of Independence are: life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Who could have a problem with women’s liberation, man?!

    It’s much like how the environmentalist whackos frame their debate. They push through punitive, restrictive measures that’ll hurt our economy & jobs, while doing NOTHING to help the environment. These environmentalist whackos would then accuse their detractors of being in favor of pollution! No one comes out against these people, because NO ONE, and I mean NO ONE, is in favor of dirty air or water, you know? By framing the debate and defining the terms thereof, these people CONTROLLED the debate.

    BTW, the feminists, environmentalists, pacifists, gays, et al are ALL communist in nature-all of them! If you look at their CORE TENETS, i.e. their foundational beliefs and proposed solutions, you’ll find that they ALL seek greater government involvement & intervention. You’ll find that, at their core, all these groups are communist in nature, and that they’re operating as FRONTS (as Art alluded to) for the communist masters behind the scenes. In fact, feminism has been called ‘communism with tits’…

    The average ‘foot soldier’ in these organizations doesn’t know this; the average volunteer member thinks that he or she is working for the organization’s STATED AIMS. They couldn’t be more wrong. The ‘true believers’ doing the grunt work are useful idiots, blissfully ignorant of the fact that they’re working for their own enslavement!

    FM, if you want some more good info on the Commies’ involvement in the feminist movement, you can go go Henry Makow’s site, rense.com, and other similar sites. You’ll be convinced beyond ANY doubt that what we learned in school isn’t what REALLY happened in history…

    MarkyMark

  14. MarkyMark Says:

    FM,

    I come to your blog in search of interesting, out of the box things to read, and you NEVER disappoint! I almost always learn something; I ALWAYS think when I come here! This was one of your best posts yet…

    Unfortunately, back when your ‘ancestors’ Stanton & Anthony were around, it wasn’t KNOWN that lesbians were wired differently. A century later, we know that lesbians such as Stanton & Anthony have more testosterone, which makes them more MALE in their temperament, thought process, and approach to life. This mistake many humans make is assuming that others think & feel as they do; they mistakenly think that others see the world as they do. Ergo, we had feminism.

    Unfortunately for humanity, the Elites (who I call The Puppet Masters, for that is what they are) subverted feminism, using it for their own, nefarious ends. If you look at Betty Friedan’s history, you’ll see that she was a card carrying MEMBER of CPUSA-as in COMMUNIST Party, USA…

    Why did the Commies use feminism? One, because their previous attempts at subversion didn’t work. Two, in order for the State to achieve primacy (a core tenet of communism), the family had to be destroyed.

    During the Great Depression, the Commies TRIED to take advantage of the situation. Why wouldn’t they? You had >25% of employees out of work, not to mention a vast majority of people living in near poverty conditions; the environment was RIPE for exploitation-at least on the surface. Unfortunately for the Commies and fortunately for everyone else, even though labor had just finished fighting management for better pay & working conditions prior to the Great Depression, union men were smart enough to know that communism was NOT the answer; the communists had their nefarious aims thwarted.

    Ah, but the communists are nothing if not persistent; they NEVER give up in trying to achieve their goals-never! You have to get them that…

    So, they went back to Square One; they wanted to take another run at subverting America and her way of life? What to do? Hijack the feminist movement, that’s what!

    So they did just that. Only the communists REALLY behind the feminist movement called it “women’s liberation”-wow! That was smart when you think about it. After all, the root word for liberation is liberty, and the three fundamental rights found in The Declaration of Independence are: life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Who could have a problem with women’s liberation, man?!

    It’s much like how the environmentalist whackos frame their debate. They push through punitive, restrictive measures that’ll hurt our economy & jobs, while doing NOTHING to help the environment. These environmentalist whackos would then accuse their detractors of being in favor of pollution! No one comes out against these people, because NO ONE, and I mean NO ONE, is in favor of dirty air or water, you know? By framing the debate and defining the terms thereof, these people CONTROLLED the debate.

    BTW, the feminists, environmentalists, pacifists, gays, et al are ALL communist in nature-all of them! If you look at their CORE TENETS, i.e. their foundational beliefs and proposed solutions, you’ll find that they ALL seek greater government involvement & intervention. You’ll find that, at their core, all these groups are communist in nature, and that they’re operating as FRONTS (as Art alluded to) for the communist masters behind the scenes. In fact, feminism has been called ‘communism with tits’…

    The average ‘foot soldier’ in these organizations doesn’t know this; the average volunteer member thinks that he or she is working for the organization’s STATED AIMS. They couldn’t be more wrong. The ‘true believers’ doing the grunt work are useful idiots, blissfully ignorant of the fact that they’re working for their own enslavement!

    FM, if you want some more good info on the Commies’ involvement in the feminist movement, you can go go Henry Makow’s site, rense.com, and other similar sites. You’ll be convinced beyond ANY doubt that what we learned in school isn’t what REALLY happened in history…

    MarkyMark

  15. MarkyMark Says:

    FM,

    I come to your blog in search of interesting, out of the box things to read, and you NEVER disappoint! I almost always learn something; I ALWAYS think when I come here! This was one of your best posts yet…

    Unfortunately, back when your ‘ancestors’ Stanton & Anthony were around, it wasn’t KNOWN that lesbians were wired differently. A century later, we know that lesbians such as Stanton & Anthony have more testosterone, which makes them more MALE in their temperament, thought process, and approach to life. This mistake many humans make is assuming that others think & feel as they do; they mistakenly think that others see the world as they do. Ergo, we had feminism.

    Unfortunately for humanity, the Elites (who I call The Puppet Masters, for that is what they are) subverted feminism, using it for their own, nefarious ends. If you look at Betty Friedan’s history, you’ll see that she was a card carrying MEMBER of CPUSA-as in COMMUNIST Party, USA…

    Why did the Commies use feminism? One, because their previous attempts at subversion didn’t work. Two, in order for the State to achieve primacy (a core tenet of communism), the family had to be destroyed.

    During the Great Depression, the Commies TRIED to take advantage of the situation. Why wouldn’t they? You had >25% of employees out of work, not to mention a vast majority of people living in near poverty conditions; the environment was RIPE for exploitation-at least on the surface. Unfortunately for the Commies and fortunately for everyone else, even though labor had just finished fighting management for better pay & working conditions prior to the Great Depression, union men were smart enough to know that communism was NOT the answer; the communists had their nefarious aims thwarted.

    Ah, but the communists are nothing if not persistent; they NEVER give up in trying to achieve their goals-never! You have to get them that…

    So, they went back to Square One; they wanted to take another run at subverting America and her way of life? What to do? Hijack the feminist movement, that’s what!

    So they did just that. Only the communists REALLY behind the feminist movement called it “women’s liberation”-wow! That was smart when you think about it. After all, the root word for liberation is liberty, and the three fundamental rights found in The Declaration of Independence are: life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Who could have a problem with women’s liberation, man?!

    It’s much like how the environmentalist whackos frame their debate. They push through punitive, restrictive measures that’ll hurt our economy & jobs, while doing NOTHING to help the environment. These environmentalist whackos would then accuse their detractors of being in favor of pollution! No one comes out against these people, because NO ONE, and I mean NO ONE, is in favor of dirty air or water, you know? By framing the debate and defining the terms thereof, these people CONTROLLED the debate.

    BTW, the feminists, environmentalists, pacifists, gays, et al are ALL communist in nature-all of them! If you look at their CORE TENETS, i.e. their foundational beliefs and proposed solutions, you’ll find that they ALL seek greater government involvement & intervention. You’ll find that, at their core, all these groups are communist in nature, and that they’re operating as FRONTS (as Art alluded to) for the communist masters behind the scenes. In fact, feminism has been called ‘communism with tits’…

    The average ‘foot soldier’ in these organizations doesn’t know this; the average volunteer member thinks that he or she is working for the organization’s STATED AIMS. They couldn’t be more wrong. The ‘true believers’ doing the grunt work are useful idiots, blissfully ignorant of the fact that they’re working for their own enslavement!

    FM, if you want some more good info on the Commies’ involvement in the feminist movement, you can go go Henry Makow’s site, rense.com, and other similar sites. You’ll be convinced beyond ANY doubt that what we learned in school isn’t what REALLY happened in history…

    MarkyMark

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: