More on the feminist-nonwhite alliance against white men

Something else about the reason feminists will never become white nationalists, no matter how brutal nonwhite men are to women: part of the reason this won’t happen is that feminists want to date nonwhite men.

Feminists become feminists because they are so hopelessly inferior to almost everyone else, male and female; feminist propaganda salvages their self-esteem without them having to actually improve their conduct in any way.

Alas, feminist propaganda tells women that they ought to be “equal” to the men they date. Unfortunately for them, men are superior to women. This is actually how women like it, but if you’ve been brainwashed by feminism, you try to find inferior men to date. Unfortunately, the women who become feminists are so utterly despicable, so stupid and immoral, that the only men who are inferior to them are in institutions wearing diapers.

White feminists get around this by dating men who aren’t white. Of course, all men – black men, Hispanic men, Arab men – are still superior to feminists. But despite the changes in race politics, a white person who befriends or beds a nonwhite person is still the one who is condescending. They may be sincere in their conviction that there is no real difference between the races – or they may not – but it is still the white person who is making the generous move of not being prejudiced, of treating the other as an equal. This is a feature of such relationships whether anyone wants it to be or not.

However much they may consciously deny it, I think that most white feminists still subconsciously feel that nonwhite men are inferior to them, making them feel as if they are in the “equal” relationship that feminists advocate.

The anger that white men are believed to feel or in some cases actually do feel at seeing nonwhite men with white women is no doubt also a powerful motivator. White feminists, like other white liberals, and nonwhites who are profiting from welfare and affirmative action, are allied against the men who built our civilization. They’re willing to give up all its benefits so long as they can bring down their superiors who created it.

Advertisements

3 Responses to “More on the feminist-nonwhite alliance against white men”

  1. The_Editrix Says:

    "However much they may consciously deny it, I think that most white feminists still subconsciously feel that nonwhite men are inferior to them, making them feel as if they are in the "equal" relationship that feminists advocate."

    But of course! It isn't as if, as the "race conscious" presume, white women just fall as victims for the exotic charme of the non-white man. There is a lot of condescension involved. Maybe this and the previous post about a certain type of "adventuress" are interesting in this context. Wilders takes that woman too seriously or better: he takes her seriously where he shouldn't. Of course women like that are dangerous, but not so much because they tend to be dhimmis, but because they are undermining like no other group, the basis of our culture, the family.

  2. The_Editrix Says:

    "However much they may consciously deny it, I think that most white feminists still subconsciously feel that nonwhite men are inferior to them, making them feel as if they are in the "equal" relationship that feminists advocate."

    But of course! It isn't as if, as the "race conscious" presume, white women just fall as victims for the exotic charme of the non-white man. There is a lot of condescension involved. Maybe this and the previous post about a certain type of "adventuress" are interesting in this context. Wilders takes that woman too seriously or better: he takes her seriously where he shouldn't. Of course women like that are dangerous, but not so much because they tend to be dhimmis, but because they are undermining like no other group, the basis of our culture, the family.

  3. The_Editrix Says:

    "However much they may consciously deny it, I think that most white feminists still subconsciously feel that nonwhite men are inferior to them, making them feel as if they are in the "equal" relationship that feminists advocate."

    But of course! It isn't as if, as the "race conscious" presume, white women just fall as victims for the exotic charme of the non-white man. There is a lot of condescension involved. Maybe this and the previous post about a certain type of "adventuress" are interesting in this context. Wilders takes that woman too seriously or better: he takes her seriously where he shouldn't. Of course women like that are dangerous, but not so much because they tend to be dhimmis, but because they are undermining like no other group, the basis of our culture, the family.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: