How dare men hang out with other men!

Sissyfuss in Vain

Apparently there has been much screeching by feminists in opposition to the establishment of so-called men’s societies at English universities. The founder of one of these societies pleads for acceptance:

Raping the Military

That relentlessly liberal magazine, In These Times, has just published a long article on rape in the military [Why Soldiers Rape, by Helen Benedict, August 13, 2008]. Echoing the now-fashionable view, it explains that a rapist is “a torturer who uses sex as a weapon to degrade and destroy his victims”. It blames rape on a military “culture of misogyny.” It reports that the 14 percent of the armed forces who are now women must submit to “military language” that reveals “unabashed hatred of women,” and that rape and sexual assault have been a problem for decades.

The proposed solution: A radical revamping of military “culture” to make soldiering safe for women.

Let us stop for a moment and remind ourselves what soldiers are for. Their job is to find and kill the enemy. Ever since the Stone Age, it has been clear that the best people for that job are tough, aggressive young men. Soldiers have to kick down doors, stay cool under fire, and if need be, kill people with their bare hands. They may have to spend hours humping artillery shells, marching in the heat in combat gear, or live for days in the same clothes. What’s more, in today’s all-volunteer army, they have to want to do these things.

The Feminist Road to Abu Ghraib by Angela Fiori

The Abu Ghraib scandal, more than any U.S. military scandal in recent memory, has exposed the utter depravity of allowing women to enter the armed services. As pictures of the tomboyish U.S. Pfc. Lynndie England made their way around the world last week, it turns out contrary to some reports that labeled her a guard at the prison, England was actually an inmate-processing clerk. In other words, the multiple photos of her dragging a man across the floor on a leash, giving the thumbs up over a pile of nude Iraqi men, and standing in front of hooded men pretending to fire rifle shots at their penises, these photos were all taken while she was visiting her boyfriend, Cpl. Charles Graner, while he was in charge of prisoners at Abu Ghraib.

England is now detained at Fort Bragg in North Carolina, four months pregnant with Graner’s child. Hence even if she hadn’t participated in the Abu Ghraib S&M Show, she wouldn’t have remained in service and been much use to the military. Playing probably an ever bigger role in the scandal than England was another woman, Sabrina Harman. Harman took the photos (note feminist Laura Berman’s attempt to blame the male Graner for this), participated in torturing the hooded Iraqi seen in one photo standing on a box with wires coming from his hands, wrote “rapeist” on another prisoner’s leg, and best yet, posed for a photo with a corpse, a man who had been beaten to death at the prison. While Harman’s parents are claiming she took the photos to document the abuse, other evidence indicates she was an enthusiastic participant, often running and jumping on piles of stacked, nude Iraqi men to crush and hurt them.

Kara Hultgren was never an ace pilot, but died in 1994 trying to land an F-14 on a Navy carrier. The Navy tried to cover up her incompetence by first blaming the crash on a mechanical failure. The real investigation found that she’d been cleared to fly despite twice committing the same landing error that eventually killed her.

Karpinski: Blame It on the Jews

Brigadier General Janis Karpinski, suspended over allegations of prisoner abuse at Abu Ghraib, has apparently decided on a tactic to deflect attention away from herself—blame it on the Jews. (Hat tip: AG in Houston.)

The Nerd Sex Why beta males are homophiles

My theory is that beta males are generally more receptive to homosexual thoughts and “gender theory” bullshit because betas, being passive followers, are more likely to see themselves as the woman in any relationship–even if they are not attracted to men they see themselves as the subordinate partner.

This explains many nerd fetishes and preferences, for example the way nerd fiction idolizes powerful women (i.e. men with breasts) even though reality gives very few examples of powerful women, and certainly not physically powerful. (Women themselves do not fantasize about having physical power.)

Maybe straight women don’t. I do. It’s funny, actually: two weeks ago I was bitching to my friends that I wished I were Superman. (At that moment I could have really used superstrength.) But I know that there are more women who don’t have Superman type fantasies than men who don’t. I once read a stupid article by a feminist using her anecdotal experience of this to prove something or other about women being more mature or some such crap. It was pre-internet, so I don’t think I can find it to link to.

Look at their hero, Barry Obama, a classic conciliator whose base is single women and nignogs (children) and whose promise is to never assert himself as a real male authority figure but rather to dismantle (white) male authority and replace it with female protection and empathy. Hence his political maneuvers, such as complaining about the unfairness of Fox News and accusing Republicans of saying “no” to him all the time, are the strategies of weaklings who seek to constrain through manipulation those who are naturally more aggressive. (The traditional newsroom bias was always an oblique form of this, as compared to overt political opposition which exposes one to attack–always a fear of the beta male.)

This guy is using the term “beta” the way we MRAs use “mangina”. Beta males are actually often quite useful human beings and are not automatically doormats.


5 Responses to “How dare men hang out with other men!”

  1. globalman100 Says:

    "Beta males are actually often quite useful human beings"Indeed the upper level betas (where I fit in) make the best husbands and fathers. They are excellent providers without being domineering and aggressive or competitive with the other people in the household. They are also far more likely to be monogomous and to remain married. If women wanted really good husbands the betas are the guys they would encourage. However they go for alphas, who, because they can get so much easy pussy, are far less likely to commit to one woman, far less likely to stay committed, and because they are always combating other alphas they tend to bring that home as well. The vast majority of alphas I know look upon women with disdain as weak and easily manipulated. I have moved vastly in that direction myself over the last 18 months.

  2. Renee Says:

    About the article "Raping the Military"I was in a discussion similar to this over at the Spearhead forum if you want to take a look. And it's not the blog – link to the forum is on the top of the page. You have to join in order to comment. It's under "Military service/Voting rights". Oh one hand, what bothers me is this whole attitude of "oh it's just the way the guys are, we shouldn't expect more from them or try to make changes". It's the whole "boys will be boys" excuse all over again: What In These Times foolishly calls the "culture of misogyny" is normal adolescent male lust that has been concentrated and expressed through intense camaraderie. It is inevitable among the sort of men we expect to lay down their lives for us. On the other hand, these men are asked to kill, be cool in the line of fire and dangerous environments, etc. Only certain men are capable of doing this. They really do have to be decivilized, so instances of rape and sexual harrassment and assault shouldn't come as a surprise. I just don't think that it should be accepted, that's my problem. I mean, why the instances of misogyny like this in the military:Who can take a chainsawCut the bitch in twoFuck the bottom halfAnd give the upper half to you… Where does it originate from?

  3. MikeT Says:

    Soldiering will **never** be safe for anyone, especially women. By its very definition, soldiering is fraught with danger, such that rape is one of the lesser things that a woman might suffer. Sure, she might get raped; in combat she might get horribly mutilated (even to the point of having entire body parts utterly destroyed) or killed.Those who say "rape is worse than death" are, IMO, weaklings who lack a sense of proportionality for what is truly lost.

  4. Chris Says:

    Ahhhh….A topic that I have first hand experience in. I’ve served in the Army for 11 years so far…been to 2 warzones..and spend about 2 years in combat or other operational type environments. Not as much as some have spent the last 9 years, but enough to know whats up. There are a ton of women who play army and wear a uniform, but I can count on one hand the number of legitimate soldiers that I’ve met who are female. It’s a sad state of affairs, honestly. There are far to many who are treated, and expect to be treated, differently because of their sex. A protected class, if you will. A female “soldier” may be a Private, but god help you if you treat her the same as you would a male Private. I’ve seen females who do nothing…don’t want to do anything…will hammer you with an EO complaint if you order them to do anything…and get promotion opportunities by selectively sleeping with people who have a higher rank. The one thing that drives me crazy about dealing with civilians is this image that we actually like those females in the military who whore themselves around. Don’t get me wrong…there is a place for those that we affectionately refer to as “Morale Troops”, but they are not soldiers…we don’t treat them like soldiers…and when it comes to actual tactical operations, they get pushed way off somewhere else where they won’t do any damage, which thank god is easier for us to do as an Infantry battalion compared to other types of units. Needless to say, as fun as they can be, we hate them…because they are filling a position that could be filled by someone competent. Like I said…I have met legitimate Female Soldiers…in WLC at the NCO Academy I was beat out for Distinguished Leadership Board Recipient by 2 points and Distinguished Honor Graduate by 1.5% by a female who is now a good friend of mine and was an outstanding soldier (She got out a year later after getting married…which is sad because the Army lost a superb NCO). In my experience, those females who actually have legitimate success in the Army are those that have enough self respect to not sleep around and in return are respected for it by their colleagues, actually care about the mission, make efforts to remain tactically and technically proficient, and not only expect to be treated like a soldier, but demand it. I’ve also found that most of them have even more contempt for their fellow females in the military than the men do…and with good reason.

    The military is probably the most obvious example of the hypocrisy of feminism that I’ve ever seen. We have the right to be soldiers, but just don’t treat us like one. We deserve to do everything that men do because we demand equality; but we’ll lower the standards for ourselves because we’re different. Can you imagine what would happen if a man walked into a predominantly female setting and said, “I want the same pay and more respect to do less work at a lower standard….oh, and I deserve this because I’m different here.” That wouldn’t fly.

  5. femalemisogynist Says:

    Chris, thanks for the great comments. You might like to follow my blog at the main site, which gets updated more regularly – this is just the backup in case blogspot deletes the main one.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: