What Oprah Did For Pooping

Just stopping in to approve comments, surrounded though I am by cardboard boxes. I approved all of them, including the feminists who checked in to demonstrate that they still have no clue how to form an argument, though this time I didn’t waste my time trying to argue with these pinheads. Good grief, a couple months ago a feminist actually cited Barack Obama to me as proof that members of formerly oppressed groups could “achieve greatness”. In the latest batch of comments, some dimwit claims that homosexuality is not genetic. I didn’t bother to link her to the truckloads of studies proving that it is; she can get someone with a penis to show her how to use Google. (This same dimbo also claims that the real problem isn’t feminism or patriarchy, it’s capitalism, and when we have world communism everything will be wonderful, and that Eastern European women – coincidentally the women from the main part of the world which has actually tried the system which she claims will turn the world into paradise – are brainless automatons.)

Also, someone at my wordpress backup is pissed that I haven’t logged in to approve her idiotic screed arguing with me. See, at wordpress, the default setting is that a new commenter’s first comment is automatically moderated. After that’s approved, later comments are automatically posted. Since I haven’t logged in there in a couple of weeks, the comment hasn’t gotten approved. This so incensed her that she left the same comment a second time, and then a third comment demanding how many times she has to post it before I’ll approve it. Apparently I’m supposed to log in regardless of what’s going on in my life so she can have the ego boost of her rantings being published on my site, and also wordpress is supposed to change its policy for her. That being the case, I think I won’t bother to log in over there for a while longer. Let this entitlement princess learn a little patience.

Also, someone named Kinderling has real issues with Goths. S/he also said I would go up in his/her estimation by posting this link, so here goes:

Couple ‘choose’ to have deaf baby

A lesbian couple in the US have provoked strong criticism by deliberately choosing to have a deaf baby.
Sharon Duchesneau and Candy McCullough, who have both been deaf since birth, were turned down by a series of sperm banks they approached looking for a donor suffering from congenital deafness.

Tammy Bruce wrote about this pair of child abusers in one of her books. Last I heard, their baby showed signs of deafness. Disgusting.

But let’s get on to what I really wanted to post about, because this is so hilarious I had to share it right away.

Bloody Hell: Menstrual Activists Make Periods Public

Today we learned an awesome new word: Menarchy, or menstrual anarchy.

Um, yeah. Sign me up. Not.

The photograph at left is the work of artist Ingrid Berthon-Moine. It is part of a series of pictures that show women wearing the blood that was only recently inside their bodies on their lips. If you think this is gross, Germaine Greer has some choice words for you: “if you think you are emancipated, you might consider the idea of tasting your own menstrual blood – if it makes you sick, you’ve a long way to go, baby,” she wrote in 1970.

Oh, the horrors of patriarchy! Those mean old men conspired for centuries to prevent us women from the joy of tasting our own menstrual blood! We’ll never be free until our mouths are filled with our own blood!

1969: Men put men on the moon.
1970: Women taste their own menstrual blood.

Gee, how could I possibly not respect the amazing accomplishments of feminism?

It’s probably no surprise that we think this new found openness is pretty great. Despite the weird name, Menarchists are trying to do for periods what Oprah did for pooping.

I have no idea what Oprah did for pooping, but then, like all people more intelligent than a unicellular organism, I don’t watch Oprah. (Actually, that’s a very succinct way to prove the superiority of men over women: Which sex watches Oprah?) Anyway, pooping is about the highest accomplishment she or any other feminist could possibly hope for, so small wonder they’re glorifying it.

I have never made but one prayer to God, a very short one: “O Lord, make my enemies ridiculous.” And God granted it.
~Voltaire.

Still have a very full plate, will probably not show up here again for a few more weeks.

Advertisements

13 Responses to “What Oprah Did For Pooping”

  1. Olive Jones Says:

    "(This same dimbo also claims that the real problem isn't feminism or patriarchy, it's capitalism, and when we have world communism everything will be wonderful, and that Eastern European women – coincidentally the women from the main part of the world which has actually tried the system which she claims will turn the world into paradise – are brainless automatons.)"You are an idiot who twists people's words and never bothers to gain understanding of what is being said. You are too thick and too angry. Good luck with your life, you and your foul-mouthed crew. And your sick ego-testical buddy, Globalman.

  2. globalman100 Says:

    "Actually, that's a very succinct way to prove the superiority of men over women: Which sex watches Oprah?)"Ha, ha, ha..GOLD.Hope all is good for you FM.

  3. Keoni Galt Says:

    Oh, the horrors of patriarchy! Those mean old men conspired for centuries to prevent us women from the joy of tasting our own menstrual blood! We'll never be free until our mouths are filled with our own blood!1969: Men put men on the moon.1970: Women taste their own menstrual blood.Gee, how could I possibly not respect the amazing accomplishments of feminism?LMAO – that's some high comedy FM!Actually, that's a very succinct way to prove the superiority of men over women: Which sex watches Oprah?Doh!

  4. globalman100 Says:

    I just love how when bimbos like Olive are taken to the proverbial cleaners by logical arugument they always end up with name calling and self righeous and delusional statements. I had one of these today on a free man forum.

  5. Snark Says:

    1969: Men put men on the moon.1970: Women taste their own menstrual blood.Oh God, I lol'd.

  6. Kinderling Says:

    "he also said I would go up in his/her estimation by posting this link,…"You missed the point.I can gentically produce a deaf and blind person, but not a homosexual or religious person. By intimidation however, I can produce as many Deaf, Blind, Gay, Muslim persons as I want.The sign of this truth is the resentment one has towards it.

  7. Hestia Says:

    The menstrual blood bit made me LOL. Feminists also paint with menstrual blood. (Here is some menstrual blood art) and many a lay midwife encourages her birthing mothers to eat their placentas. Just a couple things I learned during my time on natural birthing and breastfeeding message boards. ;)Hope your move is going well!

  8. Phoenix Says:

    Glad to hear from you again."Oh, the horrors of patriarchy! Those mean old men conspired for centuries to prevent us women from the joy of tasting our own menstrual blood! We'll never be free until our mouths are filled with our own blood!1969: Men put men on the moon.1970: Women taste their own menstrual blood.Gee, how could I possibly not respect the amazing accomplishments of feminism?"Absolute classic. Comic gold indeed!Who knew being an antifeminist could be so much fun. If nothing else at least the femi-nazis have provided a rich vein of comic material to mine. That's what happens when people leave rationality behind.

  9. J. Durden Says:

    I've been quoting Voltaire myself lately – specifically this one: "Those who can make you believe absurdities can convince you to commit atrocities."I know you've been busy but I've been writing for the Spearhead – I'd love to see your feedback on some of my work. I'm most curious to see what you think of my "conceptual parable for the information age, especially since I can trace my inspiration directly back to you.Hope this finds you well.J. Durden

  10. Meistergedanken Says:

    I have been avidly reading/digesting many of your posts, and appreciate your unexpected take on gender relations and the deleterious influence of feminism. However, your attitudes on sexual orientation are disappointingly PC. I refer specifically to your contemptuous dismissal of a recent poster (the aforementioned "dimwit") who questioned the biological basis of homosexuality. I realize it is absolutely vital to the current homosexual worldview that the condition be governed strictly by genetics; that neatly removes the possibility of choice, and therefore any responsibility. It's not any ones' fault – it's genes. Like alcoholism, I suppose. Best just to embrace it, then… I am aware of the initial study that provided the scientific cover for this view. I am also aware that the researcher carrying out the study is gay and that furthermore he admitted that the conclusion that his research reached was the one he was actively seeking in the first place! As someone who has conducted research himself [during the course of graduate school], I can certainly see the many tempting possibilities to "steer" results in the desired direction, so such studies are hardly convincing to me. In any event, if homosexuality is so hardwired as you probably believe, how to explain the cases where supposed "hard-core", committed lesbians "switch back" to male partners? High-profile cases like Anne Heche and Julie Cypher [initially wife of Lou Diamond Phillips] come to mind – both women who started off normally enough, left their husbands for women, "became" militant lesbians, then ended up deciding that they liked men after all, even becoming remarried! The party line doesn't like to acknowledge them, however. One can say, of course, that they are merely celebrities – they must be unbalanced almost by definition, so how can they be used as suitable examples of the fluidity of [female] sexuality? Fair enough: forget them – we don't want to entertain the enraging view that "if you just met the right man", you would find true love and fulfillment. I will move on to my main question, in the hopes you will devote to it the attention it warrants…Here ends Part I, as I have discovered there is a 4,000 character limit.

  11. Meistergedanken Says:

    Part IIMy wife is a high school biology teacher. As such, she is keenly interested in genetics and inherited traits. She related to me the following story… When she attended high school, she knew two identical twin girls. One of them [sister A] had a long-term boy friend for at least two years. They often talked of marriage, and spending the rest of their lives together. One thing lead to another, and they decided one night to "go all the way". When Sister A caught sight of the boyfriend's exposed genitalia for the first time, a wave of anxiety and revulsion coursed through her; she was thoroughly traumatized. Then the repressed memories started surfacing… It seems that several years before, she had been repeatedly molested and sexually assaulted by an uncle, at whose house she stayed at for the summer, while Sister B was elsewhere (This was of course divulged to the entire school, because women can't keep their mouths shut and have to simply talk about EVERYTHING). But the long buried experiences came flooding back to her, leaving her completely incapable of being "appreciative" of male company thereafter. Therapy soon followed, but as is usually the case, it was ineffectual. Fast forward ten years. Sister B is happily married, with two children. Sister A is a full-out dyke in a relationship of several years. So if both sisters are genetically identical [and being identical twins they must be so], and if homosexuality is determined [solely] by genetics, which one is being true to her nature and which is delusional? Is the "straight" sister fooling herself, and not really happy at all? Or is the "gay" sister really not gay at all, but just scarred from previous negative interactions with men? It MUST be either one or the other, right? Ironically, what inspired this entire comment was your reference to "Oprah". While I was at the local health club recently, I was inadvertently exposed to a rerun of that execrable talk show, and it featured an episode where women had suddenly "discovered" that they were gay and consequently abandoned and divorced their spouses. The typical PC hierarchy was promulgated nicely: adultery is WRONG, unless it is with someone of your own gender, and then it's totally acceptable, even affirmed, because it is fulfilling long-denied needs that cannot, and should not be ignored. THEN adultery is proper. Sheesh. It reminds me of the recent case of "Family Ties" star Meredith Baxter-Birney, who apparently is now a lesbian – even though she was married three times previously and, by her admission, quite satisfied with her men while she had them! What's up with that??? I guess I can't expect that you would be able to explain that sort of behavior; judging from the tone of many of your posts, it seems the behavior of women is as inexplicable to you as it is to the average male. I just wonder if you would care to consider the possibility that maybe, just maybe, the "right guy" could be out there for you (is that really so insulting?), or is the gay party line on such matters so firmly entrenched that you cannot employ your obvious intellect to view this with the same impartial detachment you lavish upon other topics? Something to mull over. Anyway, I am looking forward to your next post, although I am aware you currently have pressing family commitments.

  12. George Clooney Says:

    FM, would you PLEASE hurry up and start writing your articles again. You're the best writer in the whole anti-Feminist world. And this isn't a joke and no, I'm not the real George Clooney – now that was a joke originally but has nothing to do with you. The Eternal bachelor is the only one who's even in your league and he's semi-retired. Don't quit on us!! I need to read your insightful articles after an extremely fucked up day of having to deal with psychotic Femarroids ALL DAY EVERY DAY in the Hell on Earth known as corporate America.

  13. liamascorcaigh Says:

    You are a breath of fresh air, a ray of sunlight penetrating the gloom of the lunatic asylum we've built for ourselves at the bottom of a coal mine.Thank you. I needed a pick-me-up.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: