Archive for the ‘education’ Category

Catching Up

October 21, 2009

German doctor kidnapped and dumped before French courthouse

He is accused of raping and murdering his stepdaughter. But who would question her mother’s right to take the girl away from her father, the protector nature provided, and deliver her to a strange man who would have no genetic reason not to see her as a potential sex partner and a strong genetic motivation to kill her to free up resources for his own children? As was established in Roe vs. Wade, a mother’s gina tingle trumps her child’s life! Who cares if the children are murdered, as long as her cunt is wet!

As if to prove my point, the same website had this item:

One in two foster kids sexually abused

More on the nightmare that is modern Sweden: Toys”R”Us scolded for gender discrimination

Last winter, a sixth grade class at Gustavslund school in Växjö in south central Sweden reported Toys”R”Us to the Reklamombudsmannen (Ro), a self-regulatory agency which polices marketing and advertising communications in Sweden to ensure they are in line with guidelines set out by the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC).

According to the youngsters, the Toys”R”Us Christmas catalogue featured “outdated gender roles because boys and girls were shown playing with different types of toys, whereby the boys were portrayed as active and the girls as passive”, according to a statement from Ro.

It’s appalling that the brainwashing is started this early. And of course, Toys R Us is quite right to accurately depict male and female behavior. If I had my way, any business whose advertisements gave the impression that it was acceptable for boys or girls to behave in a nontraditional fashion for their gender would be closed down and all culpable for the ad put in prison for life.

Rejected women sue Swedish university

The women claim they were denied admission into the psychology programme at Lund University in southern Sweden on account of their gender.

Probably they were passed over because they were too stupid for the program. Very few women – less than 10% of all women – are smart enough for college educations not to be wasted on them. But if the university had been discriminating, it would have been completely right to do so. Women need to be discouraged from gumming up the universities and workplaces. These things were created by men and belong to them by rights.

Why won’t criminals reveal all?

Vanessa George has admitted her crimes, but she will not tell the police what they need to hear.

Detectives estimate about 30 children and toddlers were victims of the Plymouth nursery worker, but think there is only a small chance of identifying them from the pictures.

Nursery monster Vanessa George to enjoy life of anonymity at taxpayers’ expense as furious parents call for her ‘to be skinned and rolled in salt’

Teenage mother who stubbed out cigarette on her baby daughter’s back because she was ‘stressed out’ is jailed

I thought about not posting these links for fear of attracting more idiot comments from antisemites, but what the hell, they’ll comment whether I post this or not. So, good news and bad news from Israel. First, the good news:

Court Rules: Husband and Wife are Equally Disbelieved

A significant ruling handed down in the Tel Aviv Magistrates Court last week may herald a new age: No longer is a husband accused of domestic violence considered guilty until proven innocent – and both husband and wife are equally disbelieved….

In the case at hand, after the man was arrested and sat in prison, evidence in his favor was produced, forcing the woman to withdraw her complaint and admit that he had never hit her.

The man did not take his “victory” easily, and sued the State for compensation for having been tried and incarcerated. Judge Shmuel Landman found that, in fact, there had been no cause for indictment and that the man deserves compensation.

Oh, by the way, it’s now a few weeks since I told Jonna that if she wanted another comment approved here, she would have to either 1) give the names of these mysterious feminists to whom she claims I owe my right to keep a blog, or else 2) admit that feminists did not, in fact, do that for me. I haven’t heard a peep from her since. She can’t name these feminists who won freedom of speech for me because they don’t exist, and she’s not honorable enough to admit that she was lying.

Now the bad news: Coming Soon: 26-Week Maternity Leave

Israeli women will soon have the right to take 26 weeks off from work following the birth of a child. The first 14 weeks will be paid for by the National Insurance Institute, while a law will be passed explicitly stating that the NII is not responsible to pay for the final 12 weeks.

The law allowing women to take six months of leave won government support Sunday. The bill was backed by MK Dalia Itzik of Kadima and MK Tzipi Hotovely of Likud.

Itzik said Sunday that winning support for the bill was “the beginning of a revolution in which we will bring Israel closer to the enlightened Western world.”

The proper amount of paid maternity leave is: NONE. A woman with a baby doesn’t have time for a job, she has important work to do at home. And that they would even ask just shows how clueless women are about the nature of the grownup world. They literally do not understand that the reason that men get paid and women, until feminist legislation, usually didn’t, was that MEN WERE DOING THE WORK. Women cannot comprehend that money is given to you in exchange for work. If you don’t work, you don’t deserve any money. See how that works? If you’re female, no, you probably don’t.

Links: How Women Behave

September 22, 2009

A few days ago, I got a furious comment from a feminist. After demonstrating her utter lack of basic reading comprehension and dutifully reciting the usual historically inaccurate bull about how feminism has done all kinds of wonderful things for me, she demanded to know how on earth a lesbian could possibly be a misogynist.

Here’s a few clues:

Rich men are better lovers: Women have more orgasms, better sex with wealthy men


Recession: When the money goes, so does the toxic wife
As the recession worsens, a lot of rich men are finding their gold-digging wives are taking to their heels

‘You loser!” screamed Katie, aiming a vase at her husband. “You’ve destroyed my life,” she continued, hurling it. “Just look at my hair, look at my nails! You loser, you jerk, you nobody.”

Katie’s husband, Jack, whose property portfolio disintegrated in the financial crash, had just told his wife that she would have to cut back on her thrice-weekly visits to Nicky Clarke, the nail salon in Harvey Nichols, and the oxygen facials, chemical peels and seaweed wraps at Space NK.

Not only that, but they no longer had the money to pay for an army of bullied Eastern Europeans to wait on her hand and foot.

Worse was to come – the brow-lift would have to be cancelled; her black Amex card would have to be snipped in half; and there was no way, he told her, that he could carry on spending £28,000 a year on Henry’s school fees at Eton.

Chloe, too, would have to leave the marginally cheaper (only £25,000 pa) Wycombe Abbey immediately.

Such was the aggression and verbal and physical abuse that followed that Jack was left with cut lips and blood streaming from a broken nose.

Their eight-year-old child, not yet at boarding school, sat cowering in a corner and dialling 999. When they arrived, they had to restrain Katie forcibly from attacking her husband.

Usually when feminist teachers rape their students, it’s boys, but not always:

Music teacher Helen Goddard jailed for lesbian affair with pupil

A music teacher who had a lesbian affair with a 15-year-old pupil will be allowed to continue to see the girl after she is released from jail.

Despite the parents’ fears that Helen Goddard, 26, will try to rekindle her relationship with their daughter, a judge rejected a prosecution request to ban the teacher from seeing the girl for five years.

Police: Mom strangles newborn

CHEYENNE — A Riverton mother of three young children is being held on a charge of first-degree murder for allegedly strangling her newborn baby shortly after giving birth.

A Fremont County circuit court judge set bail at $500,000 on Friday for 21-year-old Lorene Quist Gines. The judge scheduled a preliminary hearing for Thursday.

Link dump

September 21, 2009

The “Bitch” Evolved: Why Girls Are So Cruel to Each Other
Researchers study the natural foundations of female social aggression

Women really can’t keep a secret: Tongues start wagging after just 47 hours

Ever wondered how long a woman can keep a secret? Well the answer, it seems, is less than two days.

Researchers found that they will typically spill the beans to someone else in 47 hours and 15 minutes.

RE teacher facing jail after sex with schoolboy, 15, she met on Facebook

I think I’ve linked this before, but I couldn’t find it, so:
Shocking 400 percent rise in women who batter men

Shocking to whom?

Cathartic link dump

September 3, 2009

Time for some therapeutic male chauvinism, because I’ve encountered much female irrationality today already and am gloomy about the future in a society where these creatures are allowed to meddle in business and government. I don’t see any way to effectively fight feminism; I think it will have to run its course until it has destroyed western civilization completely, then men will have to start over, rebuilding on the rubble.

So, some links. First, another apparent female child-murderer: Woman charged in relation to baby’s death. I wasn’t able to find more recent information on this.

The Top Ten Myths of Divorce

Refutes the usual bullshit used to promote easy divorce.

On to the results of default mother custody and of sluts being allowed to bring their boyfriends into proximity with their children by other fathers:

Fla. mom, boyfriend charged in python strangling

Authorities say the mom of a Florida girl suffocated by a python was charged in the child’s death. Officials say Jaren Ashley Hare and her boyfriend, Charles Jason Darnell, were each charged with manslaughter, third-degree murder and child abuse.

Women’s Boxing Olympic place a victory ‘for justice and equality’

Good grief.

I got bored with Vox Popoli’s blog after about a week, but before that I did go through his archives and find some great posts about feminism and education. Here’s a good one:

FS doesn’t understand that the primary reason a dual income is required is because so many women are working now. This is basic supply and demand. If you double the work force, you halve the price of labor. Two incomes are now needed where one previously sufficed. Now, about thirty percent of women have always worked; the present situation exists because around sixty percent of women now work. Send the 20 million immigrants home and remove the 30 million women from the work force who entered it after 1950 and wage rates will suffice to support single-income families again. We’ll leave the inflation aspect out of this since I don’t think she’s equipped to have that discussion, but every regular VP reader knows why the cost of everything has been going up for the last century. That’s the price of having a central bank to “stabilize” the currency.

I don’t pretend to know what the grand purpose of woman is. But it is a demonstrable fact that when women are given free and full political license, the collective actions of women have reliably had the result of eradicating freedom, destroying economic growth, and demographically murdering the societies in which they live. If you think that’s a reasonable trade-off for three generations of liberated women before everything falls apart and the barbarian patriarchy returns, well, we can certainly agree to disagree.

The Editrix has some excellent posts. She links to this: Mom Gets 99 Years for Cutting Off Son’s Genitals

The cunt was stoned when she did it.

The Editrix remarks: “Do you want to bet how long it will take until they find a “syndrome” that will label her ill, not evil?”

Earlier on the same day that the Editrix made her post, this was published:

Nadal’s case automatically calls to mind that of Otty Sanchez – the mother who mutilated and consumed parts of her newborn son. The father of Otty’s son suggested she be put to death for her crime. The similarities between the two cases are many: Both mothers have a history of drug abuse, both were likely emotionally and psychologically unable to care for their infant sons, both have family members who are quick to demonize them for their actions, yet did not step in and try to get help for these women or their children before it was too late.

The concept of it “taking a village” may seem trite to some, but it is especially true in cases like these where someone is not able to fully control their own thoughts and impulses because of rampant drug use and/or mental illness. The responsibility then falls to their loved ones – or at least their child’s loved ones – to intervene, get them help and, above all, make sure these children are safe.

What Otty and Katherine did was terrible. There’s no doubt about that. But what is most infuriating is that it could have been prevented had someone – anyone – stepped in and said, “You are sick. You can’t care for this child. Let’s get you some help.”

It does not take a “village”. It takes a father.

So, Editrix, the answer to your question is, “About 14 hours ago.”

Catching up

September 3, 2009

El Chauvinisto gave me a couple of good links:

Women With Boys (Updated)

Since last December, the following women made news. Most are teachers, many are married, more than a few have children, and they all have been accused of inappropriate sexual behavior with boys. Links are to individual posts with all the prurient and salacious details.

Women With Troubles – March 2008

Over at my wordpress backup, there were a couple of comments waiting to be moderated. To reiterate, I only delete flames and antisemitism. Well, and people who encourage women to put themselves in dangerous situations. I approve comments arguing with me if they at least try to offer some logic. Actually, while hexadecimal’s feminist cronies were trolling me, I rejected a couple of comments I normally would have approved, because I realized that I’d better not encourage those morons at all or they’d never quit bugging me. Most of the comments were comically idiotic, though. One went, “You are so right, women are so inferior! They should all just swoon at the sight of my dick!” Gosh, those feminists are masterful at the use of sarcasm.

So I approved this comment:

“Men in general are smarter than women?” “Women must deal with their natural inferiority?” How do those conclusions follow from the greater variance in women’s IQ scores? It’s a raging non sequitur.

It’s also worth noting that many female intellectual abilities are not measured by IQ tests, such as emotional intelligence and ability to read social situations. The human cerebral cortex (the thinking part of the brain, yes, that’s an over-simplification but it’s close enough for this discussion) evolved to deal with complex social situations: the size of the cortex in mammals correlates positively with the size of social groups in the particular species. In general, women are better at handling social situations than men are, but you will find that ability measured nowhere on any IQ test (or the SAT or GRE, for that matter). I would argue that as a result, women’s intelligence is systematically under-estimated.

Notice that she can’t even keep the most basic facts straight: it is men’s IQ scores that vary more greatly than women’s do.

My reply:

Typical feminist argument: “Women can’t compete, so we’ve got to change the rules!”

Also, I Googled “Female Misogynist”. A few new readers have said that they found my blog from links on feminist blogs, which I assume are attacking me. I’m not interested in reading hysterical feminists menstruating indignantly all over the internet about me, to borrow Roissy’s awesome phrase, but I was curious to get an idea of how many of them have discovered my blog and linked to me, doubtless with much self-righteous posturing.

Well, I discovered that there are thousands of hits for that phrase, and most of the ones on the first couple of pages (which was as far as I looked) do not refer to me. It seems there’s someone called the Female Misogynist on youtube. I didn’t bother to watch any of her vids, so I don’t know what they’re about, but she’s not me.

But I did get one interesting link that referred to me:

‘Female misogynist’ suppresses discussion of Jewish power on her blog

I posted about this guy a few months ago, because he got banned from Stormfront for not being feminist enough, which I thought was pretty funny. He commented on my post with a lot of blather about the Jooz’ conspiracy to control everything bla bla, and I deleted his comment. His was far from the worst antisemitic comment I’ve had to delete, though it was the longest.

The guy seems to think that I am several women, and is hugely indignant that I deleted his comment, which you can read at his post. He asserted again that it is inevitable that feminists will join white nationalism, but then, he also thinks the Holocaust didn’t happen. (Or at least, he claims to think it didn’t. Do these people really believe this shit?)

I thought about fisking his post, but if there is any worse waste of time than reasoning with feminists, it’s got to be reasoning with antisemites. At least feminists have the excuse that there is currently massive propaganda in the schools and media promoting their nonsense; Holocaust deniers are the lunatic fringe. Other people have thoroughly refuted all the Holocaust deniers’ arguments, so I see no reason I should do it over again; if you’re interested in the rebuttals, here’s a starting point.

He finishes: “I’m wondering at this point if “Male Chauvinist Woman” doesn’t have an agenda other than anti-feminism.”

Curses! Foiled again! Someone cleverly saw through my hundreds of posts, my enormous collection of links, my extensive research, and my wide-ranging search for the few male chauvinist books currently in existence. All of my male chauvinism is a smokescreen, intended to conceal my real goal: to help the Jews to take over the world!

Not sure how a blog that rants about the evils of feminism helps the Jooz, but Igor states that it does, so I must be their tool without even realizing it.

I get these comments every few months. They’re not singling me out; unless you are a Jew and say so, if you run a blog or a column, you’re going to get messages from antisemitic whack jobs. And no matter what you oppose, you’ll be assured that Jooz are behind it.

More cougar teachers

August 8, 2009

Florida Epidemic: Teachers Sleeping with Students

If you’re the parent of a teenage boy in Florida, you probably muttered “Not again” while reading your morning newspaper this week. There on the front page was yet another case of an adult female teacher being arrested for admitting to having had sex with an underage male student. This time the alleged perp was Maria Guzman Hernandez, a 32-year-old instructor at the private Our Lady of Charity school in Hialeah; her victim was 15. But she just as well could have been the 34-year-old Jacksonville public-school science teacher arrested last month for allegedly having sex with a 14-year-old student, once in her SUV; the 32-year-old St. Petersburg teacher collared in March for allegedly “sexting” nude pictures of herself to an eighth-grade boy; or the 45-year-old teacher at a private Christian academy in South Daytona who was arrested days before for allegedly having sex with a boy from her class in various Daytona Beach hotels.

One theory for the growing number of cases like these, says Sinacore, is what he calls “the more relaxed if not blurred boundary lines between teachers and students as teachers try to communicate with kids in this day and age.” Today’s kids, as the media have reported recently, are far less shy about innocent physical contact like hugging than their parents were as teens. That can be exploited by any male pervert overseeing a classroom. But it can also embolden predatory female teachers, whom experts say are often in emotionally needy states. “The trend with female offenders, more than males, is that they have emotional turmoil going on in their lives,” says Sinacore.

Dangerous Liaisons

There is no way to know whether more female teachers are having relationships with young male students or whether more are simply being reported. But as these cases make clear, inappropriate teacher-pupil relationships are not rare. According to Charol Shakeshaft, a professor of foundations, leadership and policy studies at Hofstra University, sexual misconduct is the top reason teaching licenses are revoked. “About 10% of kids report that sometime during K to 12, they have been the target of some form of educator sexual misconduct, and about 7% report physical sexual misconduct,” she says. “About one-third of those cases are female teachers to male students.”

Most offenders share traits besides being accomplished, attractive and married. They tend to be socially naive and have a desperate need to be liked by their students, says University of Connecticut psychiatrist Catherine Lewis. That ultimately makes them unable to maintain proper teacher-student boundaries. And because they may lack the emotional maturity to negotiate age-appropriate relationships, being with a young boy feels less threatening to them. “

Traditional Women Rock

July 21, 2009

I’ve been looking for this link for a while so I could post it here. Finally found it.

PLAYBOY AND WOMEN

In earlier sections of this extended treatise, we saw that so-called “women’s liberation” – like Organized Sodomy – is a weapon the conspiracy for world government devised to destroy the foundation of our civilization so that our country could easily be submerged and dissolved in the totalitarian socialist system it seeks. In this session, let’s see where “liberation” has taken women. We saw that the Communists were among the earliest advocates of modern “women’s liberation.”

An important element in “women’s liberation” is the so-called “Playboy philosophy” devised by magazine publisher Hugh Hefner in his degenerate Playboy magazine. What? Isn’t Hefner’s pseudo “philosophy” the opposite of “women’s liberation? Well, what is the “Playboy philosophy?”

Before Playboy, parents warned daughters about all the things a couple of millennia of experience prove man does not want. They told her that the natural man does not want flowers. He does not want dinner. He doesn’t want to waste time with sweet talk. He wants to walk into a bar, get drunk with a compliant woman in a spirit of perfect equality and then jump into bed. He doesn’t even want to waste time with foreplay. If there is a pregnancy, it’s her problem. In short, he wants to sweep into the dustbin of history all those “prudish, Victorian” obstacles.

Because of these millennia-tested protections, unauthorized pregnancy was relatively rare. For just one example, we are talking about a time when there was such a lawgiver in most “Negro” homes, with the happy result that the rate of illegitimacy there was lower than it is in white families today.

Hef set out to change all this. His Playboy Philosophy “liberated” women. Under the “philosophy,” a woman now can stride into a bar and sit beside a man. She doesn’t need to mess around with foreplay. She can have a couple of drinks and jump into bed, just like a man. She is free to get genital warts and sterility. An unplanned parenthood can be aborted by Nazi apologist Margaret Sanger’s Planned Parenthood.

A good example of the mentality we are talking about comes to us from one of my daughters-in-law. In conversation with other young women at a social event, she remarked that she does not go out to work. The others were teachers with “education degrees.” Of course, such a degree is an almost universal farce, not a real degree at all; usually a mélange of the Communist theories of Stalinists like John Dewey and genuinely valuable skills and materials like Playdough, Legos and games conducted with perfect competence by mothers at home, even mothers with mere high school educations.

One of the young teachers actually talked down to my daughter-in-law from a lofty union perch, observing that staying at home was probably the “best you could do.” Characteristically quite modest, this time my daughter-in-law rose up, explaining that, no, not quite. At a prestigious American university, she started out studying to become an electrical engineer.

After a couple of years, she decided mechanical engineering would be more fun. She completed that program, worked for a couple of years, then returned to complete her electrical engineering; so, she has two engineering degrees. She worked for a huge defense contractor in digital design and then in an extremely sensitive job for the city of Los Angeles, which she could have shut down. I pleaded with her to do so before she quit; she explained she didn’t need to because it would happen by itself.

How she did it, I don’t know, but she was able to con one of my sons into getting up and going to work every day, on top of which he comes home and gives her his money, while she takes naps whenever she likes, decorates their home and makes exquisite meals from haute cuisine cookbooks with an engineer’s skill. Needless to say, I shall not tell my son he has been taken, because I certainly have no intention of jeopardizing my enjoyment of her classic feasts.

On the occasion in question, she told the uppity, young teacher, “I am liberated now! I choose to be where I am!” The chastened educator, who probably could not have lasted one week in an engineering program, turned the color of Jorge W. Boosh’s politics and slunk off, returning to the “liberated” world in which her feet hit the floor while it is often still dark, she must fight the traffic and pay her own bills.

Did you notice that women who have a few children are thereby protected from ravaging diseases that afflict the childless? Why don’t the womanoids make a point of warning real women to that effect?

The effect of all this, combined with the in-womb infanticide authorized by Roe v. Wade, has tricked innumerable American women into not having children at all, or killing them – deceived by conspirators who claim to know better than God – just in time for the illegal alien invasion of foreign women unburdened by such claptrap who pop out the kiddos like a toaster. Is this an accident? No, it’s called “population replacement,” another name for which is genocide, an essential element of the North American Union that would abolish the United States.

The best part of this excellent article, to me, is that it demonstrates what I’ve seen over and over: the women who are actually capable of doing “man’s work” instead of bullshit jobs like Women’s Studies Professor, are invariably traditional women. If you really have to hire a woman for a man’s job, try to catch a traditional woman before she’s ready to have children. Unlike a feminist, she’ll actually do the work.

Like I said, women can’t be trusted with children.

July 20, 2009

Teacher sacked over racy novel that named students
An English teacher who published a racy novel describing sexual scenes involving pupils at her school has been sacked.

The book, which was posted on the internet, also contains fictionalised accounts of underage drinking and mobile phone theft committed by Leonora Rustamova’s students.

In one passage the 39-year-old said she would do anything for a smile from one of the boys, who are aged 15 and 16, writing: “It’s getting harder and harder to see them just as kids.”

Another pupil is described as fantasising and flirting with the older teacher, who compares two of his friends to “Mr Gay UK finalists”.

Links

July 20, 2009

I don’t often check my wordpress backup of this blog, so comments there tend to wait a lot longer. Anyway, some random person found my post about Katherine Hepburn and Cary Grant over there and left a fiery misguided comment, which I approved but didn’t bother to argue with, because the poor soul has had her head stuffed with so much nonsense that it will take years of head-on collisions with harsh reality before it would be possible to begin to reason with her.

Anyway, her unspoken premise, and probably those of a lot of my other trolls, is that civilization depends on people never retaliating against assholery, rather than on people refraining from assholery. That is, some people (read: women) should be allowed to be as vicious as they want to others, while other people (read: men) have a duty to exercise self-control instead of retaliating.

If it were not for the fact that men have about a thousand times as much self-control as women, for the last forty years white middle-class men would have been just as violent as feminists pretend that they are. We would all be living in a Lifetime Channel movie.

Now, the divide between those who are licensed to practice unlimited assholery and those who are expected to stoically endure it with patience normally only exhibited by people who have statues erected to them in cathedrals is not always male-female. The bad-boys who make women wet are also exempt. This is how schools are operated, as I have discussed before.

It’s natural for females, whose survival depends upon ingratiating themselves with those who are willing to do violence, to advocate this method of dealing with people. It isn’t very effective, however. People can be trained to let women and the designated bad-boy bullies who make them wet treat them like dirt a great deal, but no one can tolerate it forever and eventually they’re mad as hell and won’t take it anymore.

It doesn’t even take a lot in the way of retaliation, by the way. I’ve had people – mostly women – in my life treat me like dirt, and I would exercise self-restraint and politely request that they stop and tell them how I felt and all the other shit that feminists claim is highly effective against rape when it isn’t even effective against your so-called friends telling random passing strangers intimate details of your life. Finally, when it was clear there was going to be no change in their vile behavior, I would snap and retaliate. Now, since I’m short and female, when I “snap and retaliate”, it means I yell at you for maybe two minutes tops and then you never see me again. But even this, after many warnings, sometimes months of warnings, utterly shocks these entitlement princesses. They have been so well trained to believe that they can do whatever they want, no matter how harmful it is to other people, and that it is the responsibility of their victims to exercise infinite self-restraint while their rights are being trampled upon, that they literally cannot believe it when they hear a raised voice and a slammed door. No wonder they don’t believe that serious wrongdoing, or serious stupidity, can lead to violence. They believe they can keep friends by treating those friends like shit, and they are genuinely astonished when it doesn’t work that way.

Now for today’s links.

Jacqui Smith: I’d never run a thing before the Home Office

Jacqui Smith has admitted for the first time that she was not up to the job of Home Secretary.

She said she was thrust into one of the biggest posts in Government without any training and called for MPs to receive help before they become ministers.

She also suggested that any successes she had in her post were down to ‘luck’ rather than skill.

Also, a woman besides me is sick of women going to the office dressed like prostitutes.

She was wearing a ‘spray-on’ dress, cut low enough to reveal yards of cleavage and high enough to barely skim her thighs, with shoes so high she had trouble walking in them.

Those clothes spoke volumes more than the carefully crafted CV and told me two essential things: this woman is not intelligent, and she does not respect me or herself….

Dropping into an estate agent’s office last weekend, I found myself transfixed by the female agent who’s bra straps were clearly on display and who was wearing so much lip gloss her lips were almost glued together.

Does it matter? Yes, it does. It damages every woman who engages in it, and undermines women at work generally.

The way we dress has a huge effect on the way we perceive ourselves, and on the way we’re perceived. Sadly, the two don’t always match up.

My star candidate in the sexy dress, for example, may have looked in her mirror that morning and seen ‘confident, individual, fashionable’. I saw ‘bimbo, trying too hard, someone who doesn’t have the sense to dress for the context in which she’s going to be seen’.

Yeah. Just this weekend, I was ogling a really hot chick who was about one inch of cloth away from indecent exposure, and then I overheard some of her conversation and realized that she’s still in high school. I quickly started looking the other way, even though it’s not illegal to look, but I can hardly believe any parent let their daughter go out looking like that. Yes, most women today who are not lesbians firmly believe that women who dress like hookers are no more likely to be ogled than women who dress normally, so they won’t stop their daughters from dressing like that. (Why on earth do they think hookers dress this way? Because it makes men hard and dykes wet, that’s why!) But if these mothers haven’t deprived them of their fathers, and surely not all of them have, their fathers know what makes a man’s dick hard. I once said all this to an older woman and her suggestion was that fathers have too strong a mental block against ever seeing their daughters as sexual beings to even notice when they look like they’re trying to score $50 for their next hit. If I were ever to have a daughter – highly unlikely, considering my age and my manifest reluctance to saddle myself with a wife who could be young enough to have children – I would probably build the same kind of mental block against seeing her that way, so I suppose that could be true.

Domestic Violence Against Men In Colorado

Boys and their toys? It’s biological, not social

The males monkeys played with the ‘boys’ toys while the females played with ‘boys’ and ‘girls’ toys

Boys prefer playing with cars to dolls because of basic biological differences rather than social pressures, scientists say.

Researchers observed young male monkeys spent more time playing with vehicles than with cuddly toys.

They believe this suggests that in most cases boys have an innate predisposition for masculine toys, which is then reinforced by what they learn from their parents, friends and wider society.

Dr Kim Wallen, a psychologist at Yerkes National Primate Research Center in Atlanta, Georgia, studied a group of captive, mainly juvenile male and female rhesus monkeys.

Links

July 20, 2009

I don’t often check my wordpress backup of this blog, so comments there tend to wait a lot longer. Anyway, some random person found my post about Katherine Hepburn and Cary Grant over there and left a fiery misguided comment, which I approved but didn’t bother to argue with, because the poor soul has had her(?) head stuffed with so much nonsense that it will take years of head-on collisions with harsh reality before it would be possible to begin to reason with her.

Anyway, her unspoken premise, and probably that of a lot of my other trolls, is that civilization depends on people never retaliating against assholery, rather than on people refraining from assholery. That is, some people (read: women) should be allowed to be as vicious as they want to others, while other people (read: men) have a duty to exercise self-control instead of retaliating.

If it were not for the fact that men have about a thousand times as much self-control as women, for the last forty years white middle-class men would have been just as violent as feminists pretend that they are. We would all be living in a Lifetime Channel movie.

Now, the divide between those who are licensed to practice unlimited assholery and those who are expected to stoically endure it with patience normally only exhibited by people who have statues erected to them in cathedrals is not always male-female. The bad-boys who make women wet are also exempt. This is how schools are operated, as I have discussed before.

It’s natural for females, whose survival depends upon ingratiating themselves with those who are willing to do violence, to advocate this method of dealing with people. It isn’t very effective, however. People can be trained to let women and the designated bad-boy bullies who make them wet treat them like dirt a great deal, but no one can tolerate it forever and eventually they’re mad as hell and won’t take it anymore.

It doesn’t even take a lot in the way of retaliation, by the way. I’ve had people – mostly women – in my life treat me like dirt, and I would exercise self-restraint and politely request that they stop and tell them how I felt and all the other shit that feminists claim is highly effective against rape when it isn’t even effective against your so-called friends telling random passing strangers intimate details of your life. Finally, when it was clear there was going to be no change in their vile behavior, I would snap and retaliate. Now, since I’m short and female, when I “snap and retaliate”, it means I yell at you for maybe two minutes tops and then you never see me again. But even this, after many warnings, sometimes months of warnings, utterly shocks these entitlement princesses. They have been so well trained to believe that they can do whatever they want, no matter how harmful it is to other people, and that it is the responsibility of their victims to exercise infinite self-restraint while their rights are being trampled upon, that they literally cannot believe it when they hear a raised voice and a slammed door. No wonder they don’t believe that serious wrongdoing, or serious stupidity, can lead to violence. They believe they can keep friends by treating those friends like shit, and they are genuinely astonished when it doesn’t work that way.

Now for today’s links.

Jacqui Smith: I’d never run a thing before the Home Office

Jacqui Smith has admitted for the first time that she was not up to the job of Home Secretary.

She said she was thrust into one of the biggest posts in Government without any training and called for MPs to receive help before they become ministers.

She also suggested that any successes she had in her post were down to ‘luck’ rather than skill.

Also, a woman besides me is sick of women going to the office dressed like prostitutes.

She was wearing a ‘spray-on’ dress, cut low enough to reveal yards of cleavage and high enough to barely skim her thighs, with shoes so high she had trouble walking in them.

Those clothes spoke volumes more than the carefully crafted CV and told me two essential things: this woman is not intelligent, and she does not respect me or herself….

Dropping into an estate agent’s office last weekend, I found myself transfixed by the female agent who’s bra straps were clearly on display and who was wearing so much lip gloss her lips were almost glued together.

Does it matter? Yes, it does. It damages every woman who engages in it, and undermines women at work generally.

The way we dress has a huge effect on the way we perceive ourselves, and on the way we’re perceived. Sadly, the two don’t always match up.

My star candidate in the sexy dress, for example, may have looked in her mirror that morning and seen ‘confident, individual, fashionable’. I saw ‘bimbo, trying too hard, someone who doesn’t have the sense to dress for the context in which she’s going to be seen’.

Yeah. Just this weekend, I was ogling a really hot chick who was about one inch of cloth away from indecent exposure, and then I overheard some of her conversation and realized that she’s still in high school. I quickly started looking the other way, even though it’s not illegal to look, but I can hardly believe any parent let their daughter go out looking like that. Yes, most women today who are not lesbians firmly believe that women who dress like hookers are no more likely to be ogled than women who dress normally, so they won’t stop their daughters from dressing like that. (Why on earth do they think hookers dress this way? Because it makes men hard and dykes wet, that’s why!) But if these mothers haven’t deprived them of their fathers, and surely not all of them have, their fathers know what makes a man’s dick hard. I once said all this to an older woman and her suggestion was that fathers have too strong a mental block against ever seeing their daughters as sexual beings to even notice when they look like they’re trying to score $50 for their next hit. If I were ever to have a daughter – highly unlikely, considering my age and my manifest reluctance to saddle myself with a wife who could be young enough to have children – I would probably build the same kind of mental block against seeing her that way, so I suppose that could be true.

Domestic Violence Against Men In Colorado

Boys and their toys? It’s biological, not social

The males monkeys played with the ‘boys’ toys while the females played with ‘boys’ and ‘girls’ toys

Boys prefer playing with cars to dolls because of basic biological differences rather than social pressures, scientists say.

Researchers observed young male monkeys spent more time playing with vehicles than with cuddly toys.

They believe this suggests that in most cases boys have an innate predisposition for masculine toys, which is then reinforced by what they learn from their parents, friends and wider society.

Dr Kim Wallen, a psychologist at Yerkes National Primate Research Center in Atlanta, Georgia, studied a group of captive, mainly juvenile male and female rhesus monkeys.