Archive for the ‘stepfathers’ Category

Link dump

December 5, 2009

Killer With Low I.Q. Executed in Texas

Mr. Woods, 44, was convicted of raping and killing an 11-year-old girl in 1997….

Mr. Woods was convicted of killing his former girlfriend’s daughter. A jury determined he had abducted the 11-year-old girl, Sarah Patterson, along with her brother, Cody, from the family’s home in Granbury, Tex.. The girl was raped before her throat was slit. The boy was severely beaten and left for dead, but he survived.

Thank goodness enlightened modern divorce laws allow women to get their children away from their fathers and into the clutches of stepfathers!

Cheating wife cried rape in text message to husband after fit of guilt over affair

A wife who cried rape because she felt guilty about cheating on her husband in their home was spared jail yesterday.

Thank goodness whores today are free to wreck men’s lives with lies without fear of consequences to themselves!

Our children can’t hold a knife and fork. So what does UNESCO teach them?

Our schools are terrible, and have been for years – so terrible that even the authorities are beginning to admit it. But the teachers are right when they say that the real problem is in the home. And the problem of the home is actually the problem of an unhinged society that decided to try to change human nature. Women, it said, had to work outside the home to be fulfilled. Raising children was something that would just get done in the intervals between work and sleep.

This idea came from a wild, Leftist coven whose members long ago grew up and got rich. But it just happened to suit a lot of businesses which find women cheaper and more reliable than men, and so it took off. And it has done limitless damage. And it is time that it was reversed. And nobody will do anything.

But comfort yourselves. Children may not know how to handle cutlery, but if UNESCO has its way they will soon be instructed, from the age of five, in the joys of masturbation.

Thank goodness women are free to draw a paycheck for jobs they can’t do while their children grow up as Neanderthals because their mothers had more important things to do than civilize them!

“Step-parents abuse children to death more often”

In 35 years 258 children in Sweden were killed by their parents. 23 of them were ill treated to death. Stepchildren were more often killed by ill treatment than children who were killed by their biological parents, shows a new study from The University of Stockholm.

Relative danger

But Statistics Canada from 1974 to 1990 did contain relevant data.

Its figures showed that children under the age of two were at least one hundred times more likely to be killed by stepparents — particularly stepfathers — than by biological parents. “Of course,” Daly stresses, “most stepparents take to the task extremely well, and generally make loving substitute parents. The incidence of abuse is low.” Nonetheless, for stepparents the homicide rate comes out at about 600 per million parent-child groups living together, compared with just a handful for biological parents. Further examination of records in the United States and Britain revealed an increased risk for children with stepparents. Moreover, a closer look at the case histories reveals that while biological parents who kill their children are often severely depressed and, Daly and Wilson reported, “may even construe murder-suicide as a humane act of rescue,” stepparents who are homicidal “are rarely suicidal and typically manifest their antipathy to their victims in the relative brutality of their lethal acts.”

She got through 27 secretaries in TWO years and reduced staff to tears every day. Meet Labour’s ambassador for women at work

The whole article is pretty much summed up by the title, so let’s skip ahead to the hilarious photo:

Another picture, not from the article but conveying sound advice:


Good God.

October 23, 2009

The Editrix recently linked to this site:

Parents Behaving Badly: Parenting So Bad, It’s Criminal.

I actually visited that site a couple of years ago, but I haven’t been back. The child abuse cases it reports are too horrifying for regular reading.

But the Editrix pointed out something I hadn’t read enough to notice, though I’m not at all surprised: most of the (incredibly sadistic) abusers discussed on this site are mothers. The ones who aren’t, are stepfathers.

Occasionally, if I see a bit of responsible behavior on the part of women, I forget why I hate women so much. Then something like this reminds me.

Father’s rights isn’t about what the dads want, it’s about protecting the children from the vicious creatures who spawned them. It’s time to stop allowing women to rob their children of the protector nature has provided for them: their fathers. Any judge who awards custody to a mother should be convicted of attempted murder.

Catching Up

October 21, 2009

German doctor kidnapped and dumped before French courthouse

He is accused of raping and murdering his stepdaughter. But who would question her mother’s right to take the girl away from her father, the protector nature provided, and deliver her to a strange man who would have no genetic reason not to see her as a potential sex partner and a strong genetic motivation to kill her to free up resources for his own children? As was established in Roe vs. Wade, a mother’s gina tingle trumps her child’s life! Who cares if the children are murdered, as long as her cunt is wet!

As if to prove my point, the same website had this item:

One in two foster kids sexually abused

More on the nightmare that is modern Sweden: Toys”R”Us scolded for gender discrimination

Last winter, a sixth grade class at Gustavslund school in Växjö in south central Sweden reported Toys”R”Us to the Reklamombudsmannen (Ro), a self-regulatory agency which polices marketing and advertising communications in Sweden to ensure they are in line with guidelines set out by the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC).

According to the youngsters, the Toys”R”Us Christmas catalogue featured “outdated gender roles because boys and girls were shown playing with different types of toys, whereby the boys were portrayed as active and the girls as passive”, according to a statement from Ro.

It’s appalling that the brainwashing is started this early. And of course, Toys R Us is quite right to accurately depict male and female behavior. If I had my way, any business whose advertisements gave the impression that it was acceptable for boys or girls to behave in a nontraditional fashion for their gender would be closed down and all culpable for the ad put in prison for life.

Rejected women sue Swedish university

The women claim they were denied admission into the psychology programme at Lund University in southern Sweden on account of their gender.

Probably they were passed over because they were too stupid for the program. Very few women – less than 10% of all women – are smart enough for college educations not to be wasted on them. But if the university had been discriminating, it would have been completely right to do so. Women need to be discouraged from gumming up the universities and workplaces. These things were created by men and belong to them by rights.

Why won’t criminals reveal all?

Vanessa George has admitted her crimes, but she will not tell the police what they need to hear.

Detectives estimate about 30 children and toddlers were victims of the Plymouth nursery worker, but think there is only a small chance of identifying them from the pictures.

Nursery monster Vanessa George to enjoy life of anonymity at taxpayers’ expense as furious parents call for her ‘to be skinned and rolled in salt’

Teenage mother who stubbed out cigarette on her baby daughter’s back because she was ‘stressed out’ is jailed

I thought about not posting these links for fear of attracting more idiot comments from antisemites, but what the hell, they’ll comment whether I post this or not. So, good news and bad news from Israel. First, the good news:

Court Rules: Husband and Wife are Equally Disbelieved

A significant ruling handed down in the Tel Aviv Magistrates Court last week may herald a new age: No longer is a husband accused of domestic violence considered guilty until proven innocent – and both husband and wife are equally disbelieved….

In the case at hand, after the man was arrested and sat in prison, evidence in his favor was produced, forcing the woman to withdraw her complaint and admit that he had never hit her.

The man did not take his “victory” easily, and sued the State for compensation for having been tried and incarcerated. Judge Shmuel Landman found that, in fact, there had been no cause for indictment and that the man deserves compensation.

Oh, by the way, it’s now a few weeks since I told Jonna that if she wanted another comment approved here, she would have to either 1) give the names of these mysterious feminists to whom she claims I owe my right to keep a blog, or else 2) admit that feminists did not, in fact, do that for me. I haven’t heard a peep from her since. She can’t name these feminists who won freedom of speech for me because they don’t exist, and she’s not honorable enough to admit that she was lying.

Now the bad news: Coming Soon: 26-Week Maternity Leave

Israeli women will soon have the right to take 26 weeks off from work following the birth of a child. The first 14 weeks will be paid for by the National Insurance Institute, while a law will be passed explicitly stating that the NII is not responsible to pay for the final 12 weeks.

The law allowing women to take six months of leave won government support Sunday. The bill was backed by MK Dalia Itzik of Kadima and MK Tzipi Hotovely of Likud.

Itzik said Sunday that winning support for the bill was “the beginning of a revolution in which we will bring Israel closer to the enlightened Western world.”

The proper amount of paid maternity leave is: NONE. A woman with a baby doesn’t have time for a job, she has important work to do at home. And that they would even ask just shows how clueless women are about the nature of the grownup world. They literally do not understand that the reason that men get paid and women, until feminist legislation, usually didn’t, was that MEN WERE DOING THE WORK. Women cannot comprehend that money is given to you in exchange for work. If you don’t work, you don’t deserve any money. See how that works? If you’re female, no, you probably don’t.


September 15, 2009

Couple jailed for poison pasta child murders

The couple decided in 2005 to poison their children, believing they would be better able to pull themselves out of debt without them, the court heard.

Steijns, who is not the biological father of the children, told the court his wife persuaded him to carry out the crime when the couple risked losing their flat in nearby Marseille after several months of defaulting on rent.

Hat tip: The Editrix.

Cathartic link dump

September 3, 2009

Time for some therapeutic male chauvinism, because I’ve encountered much female irrationality today already and am gloomy about the future in a society where these creatures are allowed to meddle in business and government. I don’t see any way to effectively fight feminism; I think it will have to run its course until it has destroyed western civilization completely, then men will have to start over, rebuilding on the rubble.

So, some links. First, another apparent female child-murderer: Woman charged in relation to baby’s death. I wasn’t able to find more recent information on this.

The Top Ten Myths of Divorce

Refutes the usual bullshit used to promote easy divorce.

On to the results of default mother custody and of sluts being allowed to bring their boyfriends into proximity with their children by other fathers:

Fla. mom, boyfriend charged in python strangling

Authorities say the mom of a Florida girl suffocated by a python was charged in the child’s death. Officials say Jaren Ashley Hare and her boyfriend, Charles Jason Darnell, were each charged with manslaughter, third-degree murder and child abuse.

Women’s Boxing Olympic place a victory ‘for justice and equality’

Good grief.

I got bored with Vox Popoli’s blog after about a week, but before that I did go through his archives and find some great posts about feminism and education. Here’s a good one:

FS doesn’t understand that the primary reason a dual income is required is because so many women are working now. This is basic supply and demand. If you double the work force, you halve the price of labor. Two incomes are now needed where one previously sufficed. Now, about thirty percent of women have always worked; the present situation exists because around sixty percent of women now work. Send the 20 million immigrants home and remove the 30 million women from the work force who entered it after 1950 and wage rates will suffice to support single-income families again. We’ll leave the inflation aspect out of this since I don’t think she’s equipped to have that discussion, but every regular VP reader knows why the cost of everything has been going up for the last century. That’s the price of having a central bank to “stabilize” the currency.

I don’t pretend to know what the grand purpose of woman is. But it is a demonstrable fact that when women are given free and full political license, the collective actions of women have reliably had the result of eradicating freedom, destroying economic growth, and demographically murdering the societies in which they live. If you think that’s a reasonable trade-off for three generations of liberated women before everything falls apart and the barbarian patriarchy returns, well, we can certainly agree to disagree.

The Editrix has some excellent posts. She links to this: Mom Gets 99 Years for Cutting Off Son’s Genitals

The cunt was stoned when she did it.

The Editrix remarks: “Do you want to bet how long it will take until they find a “syndrome” that will label her ill, not evil?”

Earlier on the same day that the Editrix made her post, this was published:

Nadal’s case automatically calls to mind that of Otty Sanchez – the mother who mutilated and consumed parts of her newborn son. The father of Otty’s son suggested she be put to death for her crime. The similarities between the two cases are many: Both mothers have a history of drug abuse, both were likely emotionally and psychologically unable to care for their infant sons, both have family members who are quick to demonize them for their actions, yet did not step in and try to get help for these women or their children before it was too late.

The concept of it “taking a village” may seem trite to some, but it is especially true in cases like these where someone is not able to fully control their own thoughts and impulses because of rampant drug use and/or mental illness. The responsibility then falls to their loved ones – or at least their child’s loved ones – to intervene, get them help and, above all, make sure these children are safe.

What Otty and Katherine did was terrible. There’s no doubt about that. But what is most infuriating is that it could have been prevented had someone – anyone – stepped in and said, “You are sick. You can’t care for this child. Let’s get you some help.”

It does not take a “village”. It takes a father.

So, Editrix, the answer to your question is, “About 14 hours ago.”

Don’t Get Married

July 16, 2009

Well, I was going to wait till tomorrow to share this link, but now Roissy’s got me spitting mad (not at him, needless to say)! So here:

Women’s Infidelity

Women’s relationships today follow a very predictable pattern:


They push men for commitment

They get what they want

They lose interest in sex

They become attracted to someone else

They start cheating

They become angry and resentful

They begin telling their partners that they need time apart

They blame their partners for their behavior…and eventually, after making themselves and everyone around them miserable for an indefinite, but usually, long period of time, they end their relationships or marriages.

And by the way? I have never, not once, cheated on anybody I was with.

Anyway, Roissy linked this:

H. Beatty Chadwick 13 Years in Jail Without Being Charged

One can spend a long time in jail in the U.S. without ever being charged with a crime.

It happened to H. Beatty Chadwick, a former Philadelphia-area lawyer, who has been behind bars for nearly 14 years without being charged. And this didn’t take place in some 3rd world dictatorship or tyrannical government like China or Iran it was done right here in the U.S.

No trial ever took place, Chadwick has never been allowed to face his accuser and no jury ever heard any evidence against him.

In 1994, during his divorce proceedings, a Delaware County judge (yes a county Judge) held Mr. Chadwick in civil contempt for failing to put $2.5 million in a court-controlled account. He says he lost the money in bad investments; his wife’s attorney claimed he had hidden it offshore. In April 1995, Mr. Chadwick was arrested and detained. Nearly 14 years later, Mr. Chadwick, who suffers from non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, is still in jail — even after a retired judge was hired to help locate the money, and failed.

There is a website campaigning for this man’s freedom.

Roissy wants to believe that the man has the money hidden and is just being stubborn. I don’t; I think the money doesn’t exist. So he has been jailed for 14 years without a trial for not handing over nonexistent money. Which that tramp has no right to anyway. Thank goodness we are rid of patriarchal marriage!

Here is what I propose in the line of more civilized divorce laws:

1. Divorce should be very difficult to get. As it used to be before feminism.

2. A woman who seeks a divorce – and it’s nearly always the woman who does so – has no right to one cent of alimony or property settlement.

3. If the man seeks the divorce because he can’t stand living with the harpy or because he wants to marry someone else, then alimony or a property settlement are appropriate. If the man seeks the divorce because the tramp has been unfaithful, she has no right to one penny from him.

4. If the wife has been working outside the home while they were married, she has no right to alimony or a property settlement, since clearly she is independent and can take care of herself just like a man can.

5. Unless there is solid proof that this man is a seriously bad guy, i.e. a violent alcoholic or something of that nature, custody of the children should default to the father. A woman who wants to keep her children should have to endure also keeping their father. Click on the “stepfathers” tag to this post to see why. The most dangerous person on earth to a child is “Mommy’s boyfriend”. (Mommy herself comes in second.) Mothers will not hesitate to allow any man who makes their ginas tingle murder their children. Mother custody is pretty much accessory to infanticide. Children need their fathers to protect them from their mothers’ boytoys. And from their mothers.

Women are nurturing, unlike those nasty violent males

July 5, 2009

Witness: Mom talked me into sex at age 9

A teenage girl testified yesterday that her mother and a male family friend urged her to have sex with him when she was 9 years old in an effort to lift a curse on the family.

“This was something I had to do to help the people I was close to,” the 16-year-old told a Common Pleas jury yesterday. “The way I understood was that if I didn’t do this, bad things were gonna happen.”

Hector Ayala, 59, is charged with rape of a child and aggravated indecent assault in what allegedly began as what he said was a Santeria ritual and continued for years, eventually involving two of the girl’s friends.

The girl’s mother, whose name is being withheld to protect her daughter’s identity, is charged with conspiracy, sexual assault and related offenses for allegedly persuading her daughter and being present during several assaults.

Under questioning from Assistant District Attorney Leslie Gomez, the girl said that she was 9 when her mother told her that she had the power to lift a curse on the family by allowing Ayala to have oral sex with her.

The girl said that the notion of a curse seemed real at the time; her mother had just lost her job and her mother’s boyfriend recently had been sent to prison.

She said Ayala performed oral sex on her every day after school for a week, while her mother lay in bed next to her, holding her hand.

I’ve read so many articles about children being raped or murdered by Mommy’s boyfriend that this gave me a bit of Schadenfreude:

Loud sex mistaken for assault; girl’s pals beat mom’s lover

HARTFORD, Conn. – A 16-year-old girl thought that she heard her mother being assaulted and rounded up some friends who beat up the woman’s boyfriend, only to learn later that the couple actually was having sex, the woman and police said.

The girl misinterpreted the woman’s amorous screams, and she and four other teens went to the woman’s bedroom in the Torrington home on June 6, police Lt. Bruce Whiteley said yesterday.

One of the teens beat the 25-year-old man with a bat and others punched him, police said. He suffered a black eye and several bruises.

People who don’t know to keep their sex quiet when other people are in the house deserve what they get. And what’s a woman old enough to have a 16-year-old daughter doing screwing a 25-year-old?

The False Rape Society
News and commentary about wrongful accusations of rape and sexual assault

Every time someone publishes any article, however mild and however truthful, about false rape accusations, feminist bloggers go into hysterics, because if we admit that even one woman has ever lied about this, rape will be legal. That’s female logic for you.

Here’s another MRA blog: Novaseeker. One of his posts: Feminism doesn’t care about men: Exhibit A

A current story in The Weekly Standard by Christina Hoff Sommers details how NOW and its cohorts lobbied the Obama administration — successfully — to redirect the stimulus plan towards female jobs and away from infrastructure investment. (You may remember Sommers as the woman who was brave enough to take apart Carol Gilligan in her book “The War Against Boys”.)

This, despite the fact that this recession, as we all know, has hit men very disproportionately. As Sommers points out, 80% of the jobs lost in the United States between December 2007 and May 2009 were male jobs. But when Obama talked last fall about investing government funds in these sectors — that is the ones that were hardest hit by the recession — the women’s groups revolted en masse.

Domestic violence: Women abusers on the rise

There has been a startling increase in the number of women who are the perpetrators of domestic violence.

Startling to you, maybe.

Marital Rights

May 7, 2009

Out of morbid curiosity, I moseyed by the Errant Wife’s blog to see if she had noticed Roissy’s post about her, and if she’d responded.

Boy, did she ever.

Here’s a sample:

Their insults seem to culminate in dire predictions: that my husband will leave me and no one else will ever want to marry me, telling all women that if my way is the way no man will want to marry them, that they will be single mothers, that there will be mass killings (seriously?) – interesting that they associate the threat of not being married with the threat of murder.

She says “seriously?” Suddenly I understand feminists so much better. They imagine that they can indulge in all the destructive, self-centered, hurtful behavior they wish, and men will not be inspired to similar destructiveness and self-centeredness. Apparently they think men have far more self-control and compassion for others than women do.

Because what is a woman, after all, unless a man owns her? If I don’t have a man how can my life have value?

Remember the quotations from her blog I posted a few days ago? They indicate that she doesn’t think she or her life has any value. She said it herself.

It is not so much that I cheat that is their problem, but that I do not obey the man that owns me – and don’t mistake it, this is about ownership. He pays the bills, it is his house – I deny him sex and I fuck other men. But, he should be entitled to sex, after all he pays for it with the wedding ring – I am, to be clear, his object.

This reminded me of a political cartoon I had forgotten. A few years back there was a big kerfluffle in all the editorials and stuff because Republicans were trying to resist attempts to give the shiftless scum on welfare even more of the money that belongs to those who work for it. Naturally, some leftist cartoonist didn’t see that when the money you work for is stolen from you, that makes you a slave. So he drew a cartoon that basically said that when Republicans refuse to let more of their money be stolen and given to those who don’t work for it, their next step is to bring back slavery.

The left believes that being expected to behave morally is slavery. Being expected to fulfill your obligations or fulfill contracts into which you have entered is slavery. Being expected not to harm the people around you is slavery. Basically, any restraint at all upon your behavior is slavery.

Meanwhile, Theodore Dalrymple has written one of his excellent columns on what happens to the children of sluts. “The first was that of Baby P (unnamed for legal reasons), a 17-month-old child done to death by his mother, her boyfriend, and a lodger. Only the fact that it was impossible to tell which of them had actually killed the child prevented their conviction for murder.” And, “The second case involved Shannon Matthews, whose story—what parts of it were then known—I also related previously in City Journal. Earlier this month, her mother Karen went on trial for maltreating her. According to the prosecutor, Karen, who has seven children by five different men and who lives entirely on Social Security, organized the kidnapping, drugging, and sequestration of nine-year-old Shannon, in concert with the uncle of her current boyfriend. It turns out that the object of their plot was to raise $75,000 by public appeal for knowledge of the whereabouts of Shannon, who was later to be released and then “found” by the uncle, who would claim the reward…. Karen Matthews offered to have sex with one of the police officers who came to her house during the search.”

Anyway. I was thinking of the Errant Wife and the Radical feminist who’s getting married.

Women like these are why it is so vitally important for the law to continue to protect the rights and prerogatives of husbands. Certainly a pussy-whipped fiance might be besotted or inexperienced enough to espouse feminist notions and promise that he won’t behave like, well, like a husband. But once they’re married and he experiences the reality of marriage to a self-centered tramp, will he be able to resist taking advantage of the authority the law (should) give him? When his children are being neglected and abused, will he not find the justification he needs to break the promise of his foolish youth?

Yes, stepfathers are dangerous.

March 3, 2009

Mom’s boyfriend arrested in toddler’s death

Carlton said she hadn’t noticed any prior abuse between Caldwell and Tynisha. While she worked, Caldwell routinely took care of her daughter, she said.

“She liked him,” Carlton said. “She played with him. She enjoyed him being around her.”

Evolutionary psychology deniers seldom bother to offer arguments against its tenets, they usually just sneer. Recently I found an article online – I’m sorry, I’ve lost the link now – where they tried to dispute the tenets, but because evo psych is true, they had to lie and manipulate the data. They massaged the figures until it looked like biological parents kill their children as often as stepparents do.

Not true. The below graph is from David Buss’s Evolutionary Psychology:

Yes, stepfathers are dangerous.

March 3, 2009

Mom’s boyfriend arrested in toddler’s death

Carlton said she hadn’t noticed any prior abuse between Caldwell and Tynisha. While she worked, Caldwell routinely took care of her daughter, she said.

“She liked him,” Carlton said. “She played with him. She enjoyed him being around her.”

Evolutionary psychology deniers seldom bother to offer arguments against its tenets, they usually just sneer. Recently I found an article online – I’m sorry, I’ve lost the link now – where they tried to dispute the tenets, but because evo psych is true, they had to lie and manipulate the data. They massaged the figures until it looked like biological parents kill their children as often as stepparents do.

Not true. The below graph is from David Buss’s Evolutionary Psychology: