Archive for the ‘workplace’ Category

Bimbo sues for special privileges

March 25, 2010

Ex-VP sues Goldman over “mommy track”

Hanna, a Manhattan resident, alleged that after her 2005 return from her first maternity leave, Goldman demoted her and made her feel unwelcome in what had become a “boys-only” club.

She said she was fired in February 2009, a week before she was to return from a second maternity leave.

“When Ms. Hanna decided to take the ‘off-ramp’ provided by the firm to devote time to her children, there was no ‘on-ramp’ that enabled her to return to full-time employment,” the complaint said. “Essentially, the ‘off-ramp’ was a direct path to a mommy-track that ultimately derailed Ms. Hanna’s career.”

She made the choice herself. Why on earth should she have special privileges when her male colleagues have to actually show up at the office and do their jobs? Not that I would ever suggest that women are responsible for their own actions.

“It is clear that Goldman Sachs views working mothers as second-class citizens who should be at home with their children,” the complaint said.

That’s their idea of a second-class citizen? One who fulfills her responsibilities? Instead of dumping her kids on strangers being paid minimum wage so she can strut around the office having her ego stroked?

“We have seen more gender and pregnancy discrimination cases since the economy began its downturn,” Wigdor said.

Like I started saying months ago: feminism is a luxury of a healthy economy. We can’t afford to indulge these silly women’s fantasies anymore.

“I attribute it to the fact that managers are typically men who have unfettered discretion about who to terminate,” he went on. “They perceive that working mothers may not work as hard as men, and may not be with the firm as long so they can be with their children.”



Link dump

December 5, 2009

Killer With Low I.Q. Executed in Texas

Mr. Woods, 44, was convicted of raping and killing an 11-year-old girl in 1997….

Mr. Woods was convicted of killing his former girlfriend’s daughter. A jury determined he had abducted the 11-year-old girl, Sarah Patterson, along with her brother, Cody, from the family’s home in Granbury, Tex.. The girl was raped before her throat was slit. The boy was severely beaten and left for dead, but he survived.

Thank goodness enlightened modern divorce laws allow women to get their children away from their fathers and into the clutches of stepfathers!

Cheating wife cried rape in text message to husband after fit of guilt over affair

A wife who cried rape because she felt guilty about cheating on her husband in their home was spared jail yesterday.

Thank goodness whores today are free to wreck men’s lives with lies without fear of consequences to themselves!

Our children can’t hold a knife and fork. So what does UNESCO teach them?

Our schools are terrible, and have been for years – so terrible that even the authorities are beginning to admit it. But the teachers are right when they say that the real problem is in the home. And the problem of the home is actually the problem of an unhinged society that decided to try to change human nature. Women, it said, had to work outside the home to be fulfilled. Raising children was something that would just get done in the intervals between work and sleep.

This idea came from a wild, Leftist coven whose members long ago grew up and got rich. But it just happened to suit a lot of businesses which find women cheaper and more reliable than men, and so it took off. And it has done limitless damage. And it is time that it was reversed. And nobody will do anything.

But comfort yourselves. Children may not know how to handle cutlery, but if UNESCO has its way they will soon be instructed, from the age of five, in the joys of masturbation.

Thank goodness women are free to draw a paycheck for jobs they can’t do while their children grow up as Neanderthals because their mothers had more important things to do than civilize them!

“Step-parents abuse children to death more often”

In 35 years 258 children in Sweden were killed by their parents. 23 of them were ill treated to death. Stepchildren were more often killed by ill treatment than children who were killed by their biological parents, shows a new study from The University of Stockholm.

Relative danger

But Statistics Canada from 1974 to 1990 did contain relevant data.

Its figures showed that children under the age of two were at least one hundred times more likely to be killed by stepparents — particularly stepfathers — than by biological parents. “Of course,” Daly stresses, “most stepparents take to the task extremely well, and generally make loving substitute parents. The incidence of abuse is low.” Nonetheless, for stepparents the homicide rate comes out at about 600 per million parent-child groups living together, compared with just a handful for biological parents. Further examination of records in the United States and Britain revealed an increased risk for children with stepparents. Moreover, a closer look at the case histories reveals that while biological parents who kill their children are often severely depressed and, Daly and Wilson reported, “may even construe murder-suicide as a humane act of rescue,” stepparents who are homicidal “are rarely suicidal and typically manifest their antipathy to their victims in the relative brutality of their lethal acts.”

She got through 27 secretaries in TWO years and reduced staff to tears every day. Meet Labour’s ambassador for women at work

The whole article is pretty much summed up by the title, so let’s skip ahead to the hilarious photo:

Another picture, not from the article but conveying sound advice:

A blog and another bit of bad news

October 25, 2009

Here’s a new MRA blog that looks promising:

Men Are Angry Now

I was just looking through my local newspaper and there’s a big ad. Women who want to work outdoors, in road work crews and stuff like that, are offered free training.

No free training is offered to men, naturally. They’re just doing this to make their damn don’t-sue-us quota.

Catching Up

October 21, 2009

German doctor kidnapped and dumped before French courthouse

He is accused of raping and murdering his stepdaughter. But who would question her mother’s right to take the girl away from her father, the protector nature provided, and deliver her to a strange man who would have no genetic reason not to see her as a potential sex partner and a strong genetic motivation to kill her to free up resources for his own children? As was established in Roe vs. Wade, a mother’s gina tingle trumps her child’s life! Who cares if the children are murdered, as long as her cunt is wet!

As if to prove my point, the same website had this item:

One in two foster kids sexually abused

More on the nightmare that is modern Sweden: Toys”R”Us scolded for gender discrimination

Last winter, a sixth grade class at Gustavslund school in Växjö in south central Sweden reported Toys”R”Us to the Reklamombudsmannen (Ro), a self-regulatory agency which polices marketing and advertising communications in Sweden to ensure they are in line with guidelines set out by the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC).

According to the youngsters, the Toys”R”Us Christmas catalogue featured “outdated gender roles because boys and girls were shown playing with different types of toys, whereby the boys were portrayed as active and the girls as passive”, according to a statement from Ro.

It’s appalling that the brainwashing is started this early. And of course, Toys R Us is quite right to accurately depict male and female behavior. If I had my way, any business whose advertisements gave the impression that it was acceptable for boys or girls to behave in a nontraditional fashion for their gender would be closed down and all culpable for the ad put in prison for life.

Rejected women sue Swedish university

The women claim they were denied admission into the psychology programme at Lund University in southern Sweden on account of their gender.

Probably they were passed over because they were too stupid for the program. Very few women – less than 10% of all women – are smart enough for college educations not to be wasted on them. But if the university had been discriminating, it would have been completely right to do so. Women need to be discouraged from gumming up the universities and workplaces. These things were created by men and belong to them by rights.

Why won’t criminals reveal all?

Vanessa George has admitted her crimes, but she will not tell the police what they need to hear.

Detectives estimate about 30 children and toddlers were victims of the Plymouth nursery worker, but think there is only a small chance of identifying them from the pictures.

Nursery monster Vanessa George to enjoy life of anonymity at taxpayers’ expense as furious parents call for her ‘to be skinned and rolled in salt’

Teenage mother who stubbed out cigarette on her baby daughter’s back because she was ‘stressed out’ is jailed

I thought about not posting these links for fear of attracting more idiot comments from antisemites, but what the hell, they’ll comment whether I post this or not. So, good news and bad news from Israel. First, the good news:

Court Rules: Husband and Wife are Equally Disbelieved

A significant ruling handed down in the Tel Aviv Magistrates Court last week may herald a new age: No longer is a husband accused of domestic violence considered guilty until proven innocent – and both husband and wife are equally disbelieved….

In the case at hand, after the man was arrested and sat in prison, evidence in his favor was produced, forcing the woman to withdraw her complaint and admit that he had never hit her.

The man did not take his “victory” easily, and sued the State for compensation for having been tried and incarcerated. Judge Shmuel Landman found that, in fact, there had been no cause for indictment and that the man deserves compensation.

Oh, by the way, it’s now a few weeks since I told Jonna that if she wanted another comment approved here, she would have to either 1) give the names of these mysterious feminists to whom she claims I owe my right to keep a blog, or else 2) admit that feminists did not, in fact, do that for me. I haven’t heard a peep from her since. She can’t name these feminists who won freedom of speech for me because they don’t exist, and she’s not honorable enough to admit that she was lying.

Now the bad news: Coming Soon: 26-Week Maternity Leave

Israeli women will soon have the right to take 26 weeks off from work following the birth of a child. The first 14 weeks will be paid for by the National Insurance Institute, while a law will be passed explicitly stating that the NII is not responsible to pay for the final 12 weeks.

The law allowing women to take six months of leave won government support Sunday. The bill was backed by MK Dalia Itzik of Kadima and MK Tzipi Hotovely of Likud.

Itzik said Sunday that winning support for the bill was “the beginning of a revolution in which we will bring Israel closer to the enlightened Western world.”

The proper amount of paid maternity leave is: NONE. A woman with a baby doesn’t have time for a job, she has important work to do at home. And that they would even ask just shows how clueless women are about the nature of the grownup world. They literally do not understand that the reason that men get paid and women, until feminist legislation, usually didn’t, was that MEN WERE DOING THE WORK. Women cannot comprehend that money is given to you in exchange for work. If you don’t work, you don’t deserve any money. See how that works? If you’re female, no, you probably don’t.

Read me at The Spearhead

October 2, 2009

I have been invited to be one of the contributors to the new MRA site The Spearhead. This was especially cool because I was already an avid reader of most of the other contributors!

I’m over there as “Female Masculinist”. My first post just appeared this morning:

Men are on Top Because they Deserve to Be

In which I discuss why men, not women, have made most of the important contributions to civilization. I didn’t even discuss the higher male IQ except indirectly; I might write another post for them about that. But I was focusing on proving that it wasn’t because men weren’t forced to take care of babies.

Already there’s a couple of really good comments.

Women pilots

July 28, 2009

Actually, it isn’t cute.

Two Women, Not Feeling Well, Manage to Kill 58 People. Talk About Sick.

Today’s newspapers, where I live near New York City, carry two awful stories echoing an ugly avoidable theme — a local woman driving a vehicle full of small children and a professional flying a commercial aircraft filled with 50 paying passengers, both doing so after telling others they were feeling ill but handling the job anyway. In both instances, those inside the vehicle and those aboard the plane were killed; only one five-year-old boy, the driver’s son, survived. In both instances, the passengers, naturally, assumed complete trust in the prudence, competence and sense of responsibility of the two in charge of transporting them — both women. The car’s driver was 36, the co-pilot 24.

Their passengers were wrong and they died for it.

I couldn’t make this shit up. Reality gives us satires of feminism that even a rabid woman-hater like me couldn’t dream up.

Both women knew they were too sick to get out of bed, but, brainwashed by feminists to believe they should strive to be as tough as men, they did anyway. A sane society does not shrink from the fact that women are more delicate than men. One thing that shows up in statistics over and over is, women get sick more, while men have a higher mortality rate. Our physiology makes us more susceptible to various bugs and germs and indispositions. Women mostly don’t belong in the workplace partly because they are going to spend more time tired and sick and unable to work, so you can’t rely on them. The people who relied on the women in the articles above paid with their lives for relying on women.

As Dr. House put it, “Sorry if that sounds sexist, but science says you’re soft and weak.”

The article finishes, “Other than better judgment, could anything have prevented this?”

Yes. Not allowing women to be pilots, an endeavour which is clearly beyond their capabilities. And not telling mothers that they should strive to be “tough” like men by driving three hours when they should be lying in bed. Her brother offered to pick her and the children up. In a society which had not undermined proper masculine authority, she probably would have yielded to her brother’s better judgment and she and the seven people she killed would still be alive.

Opposing feminism is not a matter of mean-spirited wanting to keep women down. It is a matter of preserving the lives which it tragically cuts short.

Women don’t belong in the workplace

July 26, 2009

Ten Politically Incorrect Truths About Human Nature

Men sexually harass women because they are not sexist

An unfortunate consequence of the ever-growing number of women joining the labor force and working side by side with men is the increasing number of sexual harassment cases. Why must sexual harassment be a necessary consequence of the sexual integration of the workplace?

Mainly because women who can’t do the work use phony sexual harassment cases to retaliate against male bosses who expect them to actually do their jobs, or discover their incompetence.

Psychologist Kingsley R. Browne identifies two types of sexual harassment cases: the quid pro quo (“You must sleep with me if you want to keep your job or be promoted”) and the “hostile environment” (the workplace is deemed too sexualized for workers to feel safe and comfortable).

Why doesn’t he mention what is by far the most common type of case: the “give me that promotion even though I’m an incompetent bimbo or I’ll sue you”?

While feminists and social scientists tend to explain sexual harassment in terms of “patriarchy” and other ideologies, Browne locates the ultimate cause of both types of sexual harassment in sex differences in mating strategies.

Studies demonstrate unequivocally that men are far more interested in short-term casual sex than women. In one now-classic study, 75 percent of undergraduate men approached by an attractive female stranger agreed to have sex with her; none of the women approached by an attractive male stranger did. Many men who would not date the stranger nonetheless agreed to have sex with her.

The quid pro quo types of harassment are manifestations of men’s greater desire for short-term casual sex and their willingness to use any available means to achieve that goal. Feminists often claim that sexual harassment is “not about sex but about power;”

“It had nothing to do with my wearing a skirt that barely covers my panties, a tight shirt with a plunging neckline, and lots of makeup! It had nothing to do with my habit of bragging about my cup size and rubbing my body against my male co-workers! When a man I did that to made a pass at me, it was so he could feel POWERFUL! And now people are trying to blame ME!”

Browne contends it is both—men using power to get sex. “To say that it is only about power makes no more sense than saying that bank robbery is only about guns, not about money.”

Sexual harassment cases of the hostile-environment variety result from sex differences in what men and women perceive as “overly sexual” or “hostile” behavior. Many women legitimately complain that they have been subjected to abusive, intimidating, and degrading treatment by their male coworkers.

No. An infinitesmal number of women legitimately complain this. Many women lie about it.

Browne points out that long before women entered the labor force, men subjected each other to such abusive, intimidating, and degrading treatment.

Abuse, intimidation, and degradation are all part of men’s repertoire of tactics employed in competitive situations. In other words, men are not treating women differently from men—the definition of discrimination, under which sexual harassment legally falls—but the opposite: Men harass women precisely because they are not discriminating between men and women.

Women are too weak and delicate to endure the rigors of normal adult interaction, which is why sane societies keep them at home where they can be sheltered from these things.

Today’s Links

July 8, 2009

I’ve found another blog called Objectify Chicks. Here’s one of their posts: Tactics of Women’s Shelters 2. He quotes a female lawyer, who is no doubt a self-hating misogynist or something:

“Domestic violence has become whatever the man does that the woman doesn’t like. Finding out she is having an affair and demanding she stop is seen as ‘abuse.’ This often triggers the woman to file for a restraining order, where no real evidence is required. In my 18 years of family law practice, I have seen this pattern occur over and over.”

Probably most of you have seen this one, it’s been around for a while, but I came across it in my links:

Feminists lying about Female CEO’s in charge, the girls lost billions.

And another good blog: Saving the boys raised by single Moms.
Not to mention the girls they have to deal with. I’m always complaining about how much boy-on-girl violence there was in my elementary schools, which the female, feminist teachers cheerfully approved of. Few women are capable of being authority figures over boys. I’ve discussed why in depth before. 75% of violent criminals come from female-headed households. If feminists actually gave a damn about violence against women, they would be campaigning for fathers and against divorce. Also against female teachers.

Article by Anthony Daniels.

Nothing wrong with that; except that almost everywhere in the world, males have a higher mortality rate than females. Should governments, then, devote special medical attention to men? Or should they further neglect women vis-a-vis men? If equality were important in itself, it would be a matter of indifference whether male mortality rates were reduced, or female mortality rates raised. So I asked the press officer of the British delegation whether men should be saved, or women killed. She went to ask the delegation’s medical advisor, who was very angry, and returned the answer that it was well known and universally accepted that the differential between male and female life expectancies was the result of biological factors.

“Wasn’t that what they used to say about the difference between the way men and women think?” I asked.

Feminists believe that women are inferior to men

June 14, 2009

And therefore need special privileges, protected by laws, quotas and litigation.

It occurred to me last night that I would have hated Isis the Scientist even before I became a misogynist. I always hated women like her.

It’s hard to believe now, but I used to consider myself a feminist. It wasn’t that I hadn’t noticed that women were mostly inferior to men, it was just that back then, I thought it wasn’t biologically based. I believed that feminism was about encouraging women to achieve, not about forcing men to pretend that we were equal when we weren’t.

I remember how furious I was when I was around 20 and read about a fire department which was forced by feminist litigation to lower its physical standards so that more women could reach them. The way I figured it, feminism should be about getting women to hit the gym until they could reach the original standards. (I knew that men had an advantage when it came to physical strength, but back then, I thought the advantage was smaller than it is and that women were far more capable of reaching those standards than we are.)

Isis admits that the scientific data shows that men are smarter and more rational than women, but she’s furious at the people who gather this data because they are too “fuckwitted” to take it on faith that if girls were raised the same as boys, they would be just as smart and logical as men. (Isis herself is not guilty of this other bit of censorship advocacy, but other contributors to that site have declared that no one should gather any scientific data about physical differences between the races, because they might not like the results. Who are the real racists here? They’re sure that if they gather actual data about race, they’ll find out that some are inferior to others! I, on the other hand, say they should go ahead and look into it, because I seriously doubt the differences will be all that major. Ann Coulter was right: when liberals encounter science, they become faint and nauseated and have to flee from the room.)

Women like Isis are not doing women in science, or women in the workplace, any favors. She behaves like an airheaded hysteric, leading men to conclude that just because a woman has (through the ever-present threat of litigation) managed to get degrees and land a job in science doesn’t mean that she’s capable of logic. She refuses to accept that being allowed to sue over such frivolity means that incapable women such as herself will get jobs they can’t do, depriving white men who could actually do them of a paycheck. (Of course, she can’t admit this, or she would have to admit that without the privilege of suing people who don’t indulge her fantasies of equality, she herself would never have been given her bachelor’s degree, let alone allowed to play at doing a job in science.)

If feminists really believed that women were as capable as men, they would denounce women like Isis soundly.

May 25, 2009

Woman appeals ban on female metro drivers

MOSCOW (Reuters) – A young Russian woman will challenge regulations that ban women from driving trains on the metro after the Supreme Court rejected her legal case on Thursday, local media reported.

Student Anna Klevets applied to work as an assistant driver on the chandeliered underground system in Russia’s second city, St Petersburg, last November.

But she was turned down on grounds that women cannot work with dangerous heavy equipment, Itar-Tass news agency reported.

Klevets took her case to the Supreme Court in March.

“The Supreme Court acknowledged the decision (that women are banned) and has made no amendments,” Itar-Tass quoted the court’s spokesman as saying Thursday.

Klevets will now appeal to a St Petersburg court to challenge the working conditions on the city’s metro and make it acceptable for women, newspaper Izvestia said, quoting lawyer Galina Yenyutina at the Center for Social and Labor Rights.

“We need to create equal, safe working conditions, so that men as well as women can work in safety,” she said.

In its Friday issue, Izvestia reports that a 2000 law bans women from 456 jobs, including stallion-breeding and oil drilling.

Very sensible. Let’s hope, for the sake of Russian women, that this law stays in effect.

Russia was the second country in the world to give women full voting rights after Finland.

But apparently now they’re coming to their senses.